Re: Are nukes the answer to global warming?
From: G. R. L. Cowan (gcowan_at_eagle.ca)
Date: 02/07/05
- Previous message: quasarstrider: "Re: Are nukes the answer to global warming?"
- In reply to: G. R. L. Cowan: "Re: Are nukes the answer to global warming?"
- Next in thread: Alex Terrell: "Re: Are nukes the answer to global warming?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 23:31:19 -0500
"G. R. L. Cowan" wrote:
>
> Alex Terrell wrote:
> >
> > G. R. L. Cowan wrote:
> > > Alex Terrell wrote:
> > > >
> > > > So what is? Return everyone to subsistence farming and cut
> > population
> > > > to 500 million?
> > > >
> > > > Otherwise, how do you propose to reduce CO2 by 50% whilst enabling
> > a
> > > > quadrupling of the World's wealth.
> > > >
> > > > Look at it logically, and like it or hate it, its hard not to see
> > > > nuclear as part of the solution. Of course, that's too big an
> > emotional
> > > > change for most environmental groups.
> > >
> > > Obviously, then, most "environmental" groups aren't.
> >
> > Agreed there
> >
> > > If you live off public money, they're your friends;
> > > they want you to have that extra 30 cents in fossi fuel tax
> > > no matter how many unimportant lives it costs.
> > >
> > Disagree there, as far as Us is concerned. US Gasoline is underpriced -
> > raise the tax, and use the proceeds to cut other taxes on low income
> > groups. I don't think that would cost any lives ...
>
> Then perhaps you haven't understood.
> Fossil fuel use entails a routine drumbeat of fatal accidents --
> http://tinyurl.com/eyli --
And for sure, http://tinyurl.com/x3l2
> and taxes on fossil fuels bring in a certain number of
> millions of dollars per fatality.
> This calls, has called, into being a species of
> "grassroots" fossil fuel tax lobbyists.
> Anything that reduces the death toll is,
> to the extent it also reduces the tax take,
> anathema to them. Where it is concerned,
> they are fatality lobbyists.
>
> --- Graham Cowan, former hydrogen fan
> http://www.eagle.ca/~gcowan/Paper_for_11th_CHC.html --
> how individual mobility gains nuclear cachet
- Previous message: quasarstrider: "Re: Are nukes the answer to global warming?"
- In reply to: G. R. L. Cowan: "Re: Are nukes the answer to global warming?"
- Next in thread: Alex Terrell: "Re: Are nukes the answer to global warming?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|