Re: Are nukes the answer to global warming?
From: Dan Bloomquist (EXTRApublic21_at_lakeweb.com)
Date: 02/08/05
- Next message: Baby Elian: "Re: Are nukes the answer to global warming?"
- Previous message: Hatunen: "Re: Are nukes the answer to global warming?"
- In reply to: Tim O'Flaherty: "Re: Are nukes the answer to global warming?"
- Next in thread: BlackWater: "Re: Are nukes the answer to global warming?"
- Reply: BlackWater: "Re: Are nukes the answer to global warming?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 23:57:17 GMT
Tim O'Flaherty wrote:
> A solution must be politically,
> technically AND economically feasable.
This would seem to be an impossible requirement. Evidenced in that we
still don't seem to have a 'solution'. Take 'politically' out and it
would be readily feasible.
As you wouldn't take our last discussion to a conclusion, I'll do it
now. The problem is not the technology. The problem is human. It may
eventually turn out that we are not capable of using nuclear
economically, but that will be because of the political nature of this
beast. Nuclear is a sound technology; from mining to disposal. It is the
perception that something is wrong with nuclear that has become the problem.
> Tim O
Best, Dan.
-- http://lakeweb.net http://ReserveAnalyst.com No EXTRA stuff for email. What can you see if you can't see it all...
- Next message: Baby Elian: "Re: Are nukes the answer to global warming?"
- Previous message: Hatunen: "Re: Are nukes the answer to global warming?"
- In reply to: Tim O'Flaherty: "Re: Are nukes the answer to global warming?"
- Next in thread: BlackWater: "Re: Are nukes the answer to global warming?"
- Reply: BlackWater: "Re: Are nukes the answer to global warming?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|