Re: Are nukes the answer to global warming?

From: Karl Johanson (karljohanson_at_shaw.ca)
Date: 02/11/05 

Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 18:02:39 GMT

"AntiFossil" <mike.krafka@gmail.com> wrote in message

> Hows' about we try this pardner? Make me believe that
> nuclear power is safe for my health, and my childrens health, and my
> planets health, by proving to me that it is, scientifically.

There is no safe power, there is no safe power, there is no safe power.

All energy sources have dangers and environmental consequences. Holding
nuclear energy up as something which requires scientific proof of being
'safe' isn't the way to go. Rather, the dangers & environmental
consequences of all energy sources should be compared, per usable
kilowatt hour, so we can choose 'safer' forms of power.

Karl Johanson

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Wind Power
    ... >> I don't see any option as being proven safe and safe is how I would ... > Is coal safe as a fuel source? ... > solution of no power at all). ... Emanuel Burton, who knew that ...
    (sci.energy)
  • Re: Alaska PFD
    ... Are you saying we should compare nuclear ... power - which powers 70% of France, a good portion of the United States ... if it's clean and safe then that's really a non-issue. ... tons of chemicals that could also be very deadly to you. ...
    (alt.vacation.las-vegas)
  • Re: beach at Dounreay
    ... finger in the stour: ... but on the whole nuclear power is quite safe. ...
    (soc.culture.scottish)
  • Re: Olwyn Mary in New Orleans
    ... Glad to hear she is safe and sound. ... She did say that there is about a foot of water ... Of course, with no power, that will only last for so long!! ... > sewing group. ...
    (alt.sewing)
  • Re: Alaska PFD
    ... Are you saying we should compare nuclear ... power - which powers 70% of France, a good portion of the United States ... if it's clean and safe then that's really a non-issue. ... tons of chemicals that could also be very deadly to you. ...
    (alt.vacation.las-vegas)