Re: TuoZu7827eSGBe@KqaUi

From: Schweinkolben (nospam_at_nospam.com)
Date: 02/18/05


Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:00:52 -0600


<ranjit_mathews@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1108724198.448174.175530@c13g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote:
> > VW has produced a concept car that gets 235 mpg
> >
> > WOW, Volkswagon has produced a two-passenger concept car that gets
> 235 mpg
> >
> > http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1345811/posts
>
> That's 470 passenger miles per gallon if it gets that mileage with 2
> passengers. That's not very different from the fuel economy of an
> efficient (15 mpg) bus.

Busses get 3 miles per gallon max and have typically have only 6 passengers,
so that is 18 passenger miles per gallon.

That is exceedingly low, 18 compared with 470.
the car is 26 times more efficient than the bus

Bus costs 220,000, car cost 15,000

Bus maintenance per year is 7,000
Car maintenance is 200

Bus driver costs 65,000 per year

In 10 years the bus costs 220,000 + 7,000*10 + 10*65,000 + (100,000
mi*$2/gal )/ 3 miles per gallon = $421,666

In 10 years the car costs 15,000 + 10*200 + (100,000 mi *$2/gal)/235 mile
per gallon =
$17,851

So the lifetime cost of the bus is 23 times more than a car. Therefore the
bus would ave to carry at least 25 people simply to break even with using
cars.

An then there is the pollution factor, busses generate far more pollution
than equivalent number of cars.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: TuoZu7827eSGBe@KqaUi
    ... > efficient bus. ... Busses get 3 miles per gallon max and have typically have only 6 passengers, ... Bus costs 220,000, car cost 15,000 ...
    (sci.chem)
  • Re: TuoZu7827eSGBe@KqaUi
    ... > efficient bus. ... Busses get 3 miles per gallon max and have typically have only 6 passengers, ... Bus costs 220,000, car cost 15,000 ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Changing car-centric assumptions
    ... The most common type is type 2, which can be reduced by losing weight, and that means excersize, and you don't get any excersize in the car. ... As noted elsethread, the cost-benefit ratio that matters to people is assessed based almost completely on the direct up-front user-pays costs and direct up-front user-gains benefits; everything else is ignored, either because they get the cost or benefit no matter what they choose or because it's too intangible or too far removed from the decision to be noticed without a careful analysis. ... the every trip ever taken must involve the car, even if that trip is to the corner drug store which is well within walking distance. ... it's easier to walk or take the bus. ...
    (rec.bicycles.misc)
  • Re: Why motorists are leeches
    ... Average occupancy of a bus in central London is 44 passengers: ... Average car occupancy is 1.6 passengers (do a google search and you ...
    (uk.transport)
  • Re: New diesel-electric London bus.
    ... 150cc to equal the performance of the bus. ... are most normal cars 500cc? ... I'd suggest the "normal car" is around 2000cc, ... I am assuming 50 passengers in the bus and 4 passengers in the ...
    (uk.transport)