Re: About good, bad and ugly power stations
From: Hatunen (hatuunen_at_cox.net)
Date: 02/27/05
- Next message: Karl Johanson: "Re: A good wind power story"
- Previous message: philo: "Re: A good wind power story"
- In reply to: Baby Elian: "Re: About good, bad and ugly power stations"
- Next in thread: Jo Stein: "Re: About good, bad and ugly power stations"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 12:58:39 -0800
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 10:37:38 GMT, "Baby Elian" <sandrino77(NO
SPAM)@virgilio.it> wrote:
>
>> Co-generation is good, but the piping to distribute heat from a nuclear
>> power plant many miles from a population center must no be economical.
>> Otherwise, it would be used now.
>> Dist rict heating requires a district to heat. Nuclear power
>> plants in the USA are purposefully located far from population
>> centers. The distances are simply too great for piping heat to
>> the population center. Even conventional plants stopped supplying district
>> heat once
>> central stations were moved out of city centers.
>
>For example,I thought about a small Htgr reactor,e.g. a 165 MWe pebble bed
>reactor,located *not so far* from a city center
>How far could we put a thermal plant to be this district heat cost
>effective?Is there an economical- technical document (or paper) on the web?
>What can we estimate the thermal energy requiriments for a one hundred
>thousand (or more) of inhabitants town?
>
Wrong questions.
How can you convince the public they want a nuclear reacotr
closer to town?
************* DAVE HATUNEN (hatunen@cox.net) *************
* Tucson Arizona, out where the cacti grow *
* My typos & mispellings are intentional copyright traps *
- Next message: Karl Johanson: "Re: A good wind power story"
- Previous message: philo: "Re: A good wind power story"
- In reply to: Baby Elian: "Re: About good, bad and ugly power stations"
- Next in thread: Jo Stein: "Re: About good, bad and ugly power stations"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|