Re: Are nukes the answer to global warming?
From: Scott A Crosby (scrosby_at_cs.rice.edu)
Date: 03/11/05
- Next message: G. R. L. Cowan: "Re: Are nukes the answer to global warming?"
- Previous message: Scott A Crosby: "Re: Are nukes the answer to global warming?"
- In reply to: Clouseau2: "Re: Are nukes the answer to global warming?"
- Next in thread: Ed Earl Ross: "Re: Are nukes the answer to global warming?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:39:27 -0600
On 8 Mar 2005 11:11:03 -0800, "Clouseau2" <eric@webmethods.com> writes:
> Now other sources of energy don't have such a spectacularly high
> energy profit ratio. In fact virtually none of them do, and that's
> true of coal, that's true of nuclear energy, it's true of wind,
> solar and all the rest.
Please give the citation for nuclear energy's poor energy profit ratio.
> You might be noticing a pattern here. I actually back up stuff with
> references and data
> Yup, and once goal gasification starts up bigtime, and we turn the
> planet into another Venus, the few million that might be able to
> survive will able to try "plan B" for humanity.
And, if you have time, for this too.
Scott
- Next message: G. R. L. Cowan: "Re: Are nukes the answer to global warming?"
- Previous message: Scott A Crosby: "Re: Are nukes the answer to global warming?"
- In reply to: Clouseau2: "Re: Are nukes the answer to global warming?"
- Next in thread: Ed Earl Ross: "Re: Are nukes the answer to global warming?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]