still relying on fossil fuels?

From: ring_theory (ring_theory_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 03/28/05


Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 20:09:17 GMT

I would think that mankind would have discovered the method of transforming
energy infinite by now.

Some of the greatest minds on the planet are perplexed at how to escape the
energy crisis.

It's a simple set of transformations people!

But to achieve it The scientific society is going to have to overcome their
opinion of these,
"Perpetual motion", "Over-unity", "Free-energy", and "Anti-gravity".

Perpetual motion, may not be possible, but yet near perpetual anomalies
 exist.
Over-unity, Unity needs to exist in the form of a mechanism before
we can explore over-unity.
Free-energy, opinions on thermodynamics depict that there is no free ride.
This is a major problem created by academic institutes. They inforce that
the laws cannot be broken bieng totally ignorant to the fact that they can
be upheld and utilized in a mechanism.
Anti-gravity, this mechanism exists but the energy required to produce this
effect is depleted. It's simply the "frisbee". Some think that it is the
aerodynamics of the item that supports the frisbee in flight. The main force
is the eccentric motion of the mass. you can reproduce this with any shaped
object by putting a spin on it as you release it. However the aerodynamics
of the item does cause a definate drag for the items that are less
aerodynamic.

The sad thing is that there is NO research bieng done in any of these fields
as they have been dismissed as quackery for one reason or another.

Mankind Has exhausted the rocket sciences, and reached their limits as far
as energy producing methods. It's time for man to explore new innovative
energy technology.

I am the inventor of this innovative technology. I must surely be the head
quack as the mechanism I invented unifies all four of the above mentioned
and most of physics.

Believe it or not I'm not really concerned with what you believe.
I'm concerned with prototypes and will be producing a working model soon.

Ring



Relevant Pages

  • Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?
    ... nonsensical because there are types of ENERGY we have no clue ... but this is not considered transforming energy into matter either. ... and complex organic materials are made. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Terrifying future phrases
    ... bombardment in 1919 (transforming nitrogen to oxygen, ... "atoms" were no elementary, and could be changed from one form to another. ... >They would also know that these transformations sometimes gave off energy. ... Someone with an interest in science isn't always a scientist. ...
    (rec.arts.sf.written)
  • Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?
    ... nonsensical because there are types of ENERGY we have no clue ... but this is not considered transforming energy into matter either. ... Plants EAT light. ... We EAT bottled sunlight when we eat plants or animals. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?
    ... nonsensical because there are types of ENERGY we have no clue ... but this is not considered transforming energy into matter either. ... Plants EAT light. ... We EAT bottled sunlight when we eat plants or animals. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: what does E=mc^2 means anyway?
    ... nonsensical because there are types of ENERGY we have no clue ... but this is not considered transforming energy into matter either. ... and requires a positive energy input. ... The atom now has a greater "inertia". ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)