Re: Electric Power Plant Types--Partial Comparison
- From: Ed Earl Ross <edearl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 04:37:46 GMT
Paul E. Bennett wrote:
Ed Earl Ross wrote:
Nuclear $300M for 200MW Cleaner Coal $396M for 200MW Australia Solar Tower $670M for 200MW Portugal PV $1000M for 200MW OTEC $1000M for 200MW
Why pick 200MW as the standard power station size for your study. New Nuclear/Coal/Oil Builds will usually be in the order of 1GW to 2GW per plant and often 2 such plants on the same site. It does not seem to make economic sense to build smaller units.
The reference I found for nuclear costs was $/kWh, without variation for size of plant. Thus, it didn't seem relevant to consider a larger plant. Do you have another references that indicates how larger installations affect construction cost?
*Nuclear* Calculation: $1500/kw * 200,000kw = $300,000,000 Nuclear overnight construction costs ranged from US$ 1000/kW in Czech Republic to $2500/kW in Japan, and averaged $1500/kW. Coal plants were costed at $1000-1500/kW, gas plants $500-1000/kW and wind capacity $1000-1500/kW. Ref: uic.com.au/nip08.htm
-- Humbly--Ed
"If the man doesn't believe as we do, we say he is a crank, and that settles it. I mean, it does nowadays, because now we can't burn him." (Mark Twain) .
- References:
- Electric Power Plant Types--Partial Comparison
- From: Ed Earl Ross
- Re: Electric Power Plant Types--Partial Comparison
- From: Paul E. Bennett
- Electric Power Plant Types--Partial Comparison
- Prev by Date: Re: A clothes dryer running at more then 100% efficiency
- Next by Date: Re: A clothes dryer running at more then 100% efficiency
- Previous by thread: Re: Electric Power Plant Types--Partial Comparison
- Next by thread: Re: Electric Power Plant Types--Partial Comparison
- Index(es):