Re: 80% Efficiency From A De Lavel Wind Turbine
- From: "Bret Cahill" <BretCahill@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Aug 2005 20:44:28 -0700
< Hmm... how about building a conduit up the side of a mountain, so
that the
< up-hill exhaust port is at much lower atmos pressure than the
down-hill
< intake port?
The nose cone changes the pressure/wind speed.
Before the stator and rotor blading the nose cone increases the wind
speed which DECREASES the pressure and DECREASES the blade length.
As the air exits the rotor it isn't a problem because it
1. reassumes the initial pressure
2. moves into all the space behind the nose cone.
Much much better than the 3 blade turbine slinging air into an
expanding cone.
Bret Cahill
.
- References:
- 80% Efficiency From A De Lavel Wind Turbine
- From: Bret Cahill
- Re: 80% Efficiency From A De Lavel Wind Turbine
- From: daestrom
- Re: 80% Efficiency From A De Lavel Wind Turbine
- From: Don Libby
- 80% Efficiency From A De Lavel Wind Turbine
- Prev by Date: Re: 80% Efficiency From A De Lavel Wind Turbine
- Next by Date: Strategic Petroleum Reserve/Speculative Markets
- Previous by thread: Re: 80% Efficiency From A De Lavel Wind Turbine
- Next by thread: Re: 80% Efficiency From A De Lavel Wind Turbine
- Index(es):