Re: Global Warming




"Chris" <nimbo@(no-spam)ukonline.co.uk> wrote in message
news:oToSe.5261$pm2.547@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hello
>
> It has been accepted that gasoline use and other fossil fuel use is the
> cause of the increase in carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. This is the
main
> cause of global warming, but I think an increase in the solar output has
> occurred as well.
>
> What to do:
>
> Well oil is getting short and may be in very short supply next year and we
> need a replacement. The use of coal as a starting point for oil
production
> will not improve the atmospheric carbon problem, we need a fuel that does
> not burn carbon in oxygen to make carbon dioxide.
>
> I know it is a long way off but thermonuclear fusion is the only real
> solution. My web page on http://www.chrisspages.co.uk has some
suggestions
> for this and other life preserving machines that might improve the human
> survival rate.
>
> Another planet saving measure is to use electrlysis to split carbon
dioxide
> into cabonate that can be made into calcium carbonate and buried and
oxygen.
> I think it is called the frash process where salt is mixed with carbon
> dioxide gas in aquious solution and an electric current passed. The
result
> is the oxygen is released and sodium carbonate made. This may then be
mixed
> with calcium chloride solution to precipitate calcium carbonate, the
sodium
> chloride solution is then recycled.
>
> Themonuclear power could be used to power these atmospheric scrubbers and
> over a few years the atmosphere returned to it old state of 5000 years ago
> before human beings used fire in a big way.
>
> The use of district power stations using the controlled thermonuclear
fusion
> of hydrogen made by the electrolysis of sea water (making also oxygen)
will
> make the burning of fossil fuels a thing of the past.
>
> Locomotives will be electrically powered, the family car by a battery, we
> need an improved battery like the rechargable lithium ion cell so that it
> will have a reasonable range, 200 miles, and speed, 80 miles per hour,
> between charges. The charging needs to be rapid, like over 15 minutes so
> that the driver and passengers could refuel during a lunch break.
Railways
> would be electrified and ships and aircraft use thermonuclear fusion units
> as prime movers.
>
> In this way human life will be preserved and our planet will become,
again,
> a pleasant place.
>
> Hydrogen fusion is easy and takes place all the time at a slow rate at
room
> temperature and pressure. The difficulty is getting it to react fast
enough
> in a controlled way and to collect the electrical power from the unit in a
> direct way without turbines or heat exchangers. I think I have worked out
> this way and I have applied for a patent in the UK. The idea is being
> assessed by Government officials and I fear they may dich it in the bin
> because of the predjudice and all their inventments in the failed methods
> that they have beeb fiddling about with for 40 years. My unit only cost
me
> £30 (GBP) to build in 1967 but I was ridiculed and sent for psychiatric
> treatment. Although the psychiatric nurse sent to investigate saw it
> working and died of radiation sickness when caught in a blast when it was
> switched off at his request while he was bending over it (I was behind a
> lead castle) they did not believe me.
>
> I later (1969) built one at a Government lab during the first few weeks
> after graduating but although several emminent scientists witnessed it it
> was rejected. Most of the witnesses died when the unit exploded in a
small
> nuclear blast in a bunker at a military base where it was moved since we
> could not figure out how to turn off this more poweful unit safely. It
was
> regarded as a most dangerous physics experiment.
>
> I think I can see how to control the reaction but it is very dangerous and
a
> in a later one (1998) the control resistor glowed red hot and I used a
> magnet to safely extinguish it.
>
> So a potential power unit is there and in my web page I attempt to explain
> the physical reasons for its working. I have not the knowledge of fusion
> reactions and I'm reading about the fundimental physics now, in a book a
> yard thick that cost £45 (GBP).
>
> Well it was 27 C in my room this evening but my air conditioner unit has
> brought it down to 24 while I have been typing these words. It is 10:30pm
> here in London, UK.
>
> After my experience and subsequent psychiatric treatment (several
sessions)
> designed to render me amnesic (successful) and stupid (successful), I left
> the Atomic Weapons reaearch unit and decided to work as a washer up, quite
> volantarily, as I did not want to get involved in these weapons of mass
> destruction as all the do is kill people.
>
> I just hope that someone will repeat this vague memory of a successful
> reactor and not only make money but create a new power source to "save the
> world" from global catatrophe.
>
> It may already be too late for lots of us, there are expected to be more
> katrina sized hurricanes landing in southern america and severe weather
all
> over the world, this will continue to worsen all the time we cease to use
> fossil carbon as fuel.
>
> Chris,
> London.
>

>From above: "but I think an increase in the solar output has
occurred as well." Actually I believe that solar output is actually
decreasing plus the albito of the earth is increasing because of increase of
particulates in the atmosphere. Both of these things tend to cool the earth.
However, the fact the earth is warming, glaciers are melting, permafrost is
dissapearing, and the oceans are warming illustrates the power of the
greenhouse effect in overwhelming any cooling trends, at least for now. CO2
and methane are the main culprets aside from water vapor which is there
anyway.
Bob


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Off Topic - "An Inconvenient Truth"
    ... Even electric and hybrid cars don't improve matters if the power to ... Oil is almost non-existant as a generator of electricity. ... The next big thing in carbon are probably: ... this can marginally reduce fossil fuel emissions (mostly by powering ...
    (rec.arts.sf.written)
  • Power Execs Foresee Carbon Emission Caps
    ... Power Execs Foresee Carbon Emission Caps ... accounts for almost 40 percent of U.S. carbon dioxide emissions. ... Associates and a longtime proponent of clean energy. ...
    (sci.energy)
  • Power Execs Foresee Carbon Emission Caps
    ... Power Execs Foresee Carbon Emission Caps ... accounts for almost 40 percent of U.S. carbon dioxide emissions. ... Associates and a longtime proponent of clean energy. ...
    (misc.invest.stocks)
  • Re: Mr Rayners views of Electrification.
    ... and tidal power will all have a role to play as well. ... But the basic problem that burning coal boils down to carbon + oxygen ... just as burning gas or oil products ... (CO2 and H20) ...
    (uk.railway)
  • Re: An Inconvenient truth for Greenies
    ... It's bleeding obvious we will use the sun's power in the future. ... When the last drop of oil runs out solar will already be ready to take ... For example carbon capture and sequestrate, ... oil wells etc. Blah, blah blah is cheap. ...
    (soc.culture.scottish)