Re: Mobile S-Rotor!
- From: "TomGee" <lvlus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 2 Dec 2005 16:58:34 -0800
liberti wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> It is the resistance to the wind that drives your turbine.
> Two scenarios:
>
> 1)Your car has just enough power to maintain a constant speed of 50mph
> on flat road. Up pops your turbine- either the car slows down a bit, or
> you have to apply more throttle (and use more gas, and increase
> pollutants) to maintain the car at 50mph
>
>
I appreciate your comments. You're right that either the car slows or
more gas must used to maintain speed. My point is not that nothing
happens when my rotor pops up but that the amount of more gas that must
be used is still less than that which the vehicle engine uses to drive
the vehicle alternator - which is from 4 - 30 hp, while the rotor needs
only 1 - 2 hp to produce the same amount of power. The net savings are
from 2 - 28 hp, or an average of 15 hp. My calculations amount to
about a 10% savings in fuel usage, but until further testing, it's
still only a guess.
>
>
> 2) This ones a bit childish but makes the point - you state that you
> estimate fuel savings of 10%. If you fit 10 of these on your car, does
> the car no longer require fuel?.....no
>
>
Very funny.....yes.
>
>
> But dont give up, at least you're trying, which is more than can be
> said for the other 99.99%
> Good luck.
>
>
Thanks. I will provide updates as I go along, even if the whole thing
turns out to be a flop!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Mobile S-Rotor!
- From: K. Jones
- Re: Mobile S-Rotor!
- References:
- Mobile S-Rotor!
- From: TomGee
- Re: Mobile S-Rotor!
- From: liberti
- Mobile S-Rotor!
- Prev by Date: Sequestering CO2 and the Solar Hydrogen Economy
- Next by Date: Re: Mobile S-Rotor!
- Previous by thread: Re: Mobile S-Rotor!
- Next by thread: Re: Mobile S-Rotor!
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading