Re: Can Nuclear Power Deliver?

In article <1138226368.896803.127370@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
LongmuirG@xxxxxxx says...
>
>
>Citizen wrote:
>> That seems to be the current mainstream thinking. The future energy
>> system will have many sources of energy to feed it and use many
>> carriers to convert this energy into services.
>
>That may be mainstream thinking among certain enviroweenies, but it
>does not make a lot of sense.
>
>Human beings currently use only 3 major energy sources (fossil, hydro,
>nuclear) -- 5 if we split fossil into oil, coal, gas. About the only
>market where those energy sources compete is in electric generation,
>where hydro, nuclear, coal & gas all supply part of the demand. Even
>there, gas is mainly used for short-duration peaking demand. If we
>look at transportation, oil is the almost universal fuel of choice --
>whether we are talking airplanes, ships, or trucks.
>
>For each energy use, there is a "most efficient" energy source --
>however we humans choose to define efficiency. It is good conservation
>to make the maximum use of the most efficient source. That is why
>humans will continue to rely on only a handful of energy sources for
>most of their energy demand. All the enviro-blather about multiple
>"green" energy sources is just a cover for the politically
>well-connected to get their hands on taxes paid by ordinary people. It
>is surprising that you have fallen for the scam.

A cover for the politically well-connected it precisely is.
On this important point you're quite right, Longmuir.

And they not only are after higher taxes from ordinary people.
These big scams are going even deeper than this; they are
disseminated by those people in defence of their very rule
in the world, which they themselves realize is long-since
outmoded.

Where, then, are those forces which might lead the people in
all countries to take over this planet - which is becoming
more and more necessary?

Unfortunately, they so far they seem to be practically non-existent.
But somehow, such will arise anyway, I believe.

Rolf M.
www.rolf-martens.com

.

Relevant Pages

  • Andrew McKillop: Energy transition and final energy crisis
    ... Energy transition and final energy crisis ... VHeadline.com oil industry commentarist Andrew McKillop writes: ... commercial energy demand, overall, is well over 90% based on non- ... permanent supply crisis for oil and gas (which currently provide about ...
    (sci.energy)
  • Re: Can Nuclear Power Deliver?
    ... > system will have many sources of energy to feed it and use many ... That may be mainstream thinking among certain enviroweenies, ... where hydro, nuclear, coal & gas all supply part of the demand. ...
    (sci.energy)
  • Re: Can Nuclear Power Deliver?
    ... That seems to be the current mainstream thinking. ... The future energy ... system will have many sources of energy to feed it and use many ... carriers to convert this energy into services. ...
    (sci.energy)
  • Re: Sci.Energy Geeks, take a look
    ... approximately 66% in the product gas stream with a 98.2% mol conversion ... solar mirror area. ... appears to deliver more energy than it receives. ... translates into additional cost for the solar mirror array. ...
    (sci.energy.hydrogen)
  • Re: Why Gaia is wreaking revenge on our abuse of the environment
    ... What energy policy? ... Britain was on the brink of running out of energy. ... Britain became a net importer of gas. ... Politicians - please drop the pusillanimous cant, get off your backsides, and, ...
    (sci.geo.geology)