Re: Gaseous Chemical Feedstocks
- From: peterwezeman@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 11 Mar 2006 14:23:06 -0800
peterwezeman@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
A recent article pointed out how many chemical plants have been builtIt has since come to my attention that the company Rentech is currently
to use natural gas
as a feedstock over the years when it was relatively cheap compared to
other hydrocarbons.
It is used to make fertilizer, hydrogen gas, plastics, and low-sulfur
diesel oil, among many
other products. Now that gas is no longer cheap, does it make more
sense to convert to
another feedstock, or it practical to somehow produce synthetic methane
to pipe into
existing distribution systems and chemical plants?
In the case of low-sulfur diesel, I happen to know that the natural gas
is partially burned to
make carbon monoxide, which is then turned into oil using the
Fischer-Tropsch process.
Carbon monoxide from any source would do as well, and we already
produce it from coal
and biomass on a large scale.
A related point, one of the reasons natural gas is a convenient
feedstock is that it can be
piped in with little waste, unlike bringing in trainloads of coal. Is
it practical to make coal gas
at central plants and pipe it to chemical plants some distance away?
working on converting fertilizer manufacture from natural gas to coal
gas.
http://www.rentechinc.com/
Peter Wezeman
anti-social Darwinist
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Help with Solar Oven article by sci
- Next by Date: Re: ????????solar energy????????
- Previous by thread: Help with Solar Oven article by sci
- Next by thread: Re: ????????solar energy????????
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|