Re: a new hope for an energy source

Thanks Bill, I'm still trying to understand the whole hydrogen thing,
how it's a carrier rather than a source, etc., and hopefully I'll add
stuff to it soon. Nuclear fission and fusion are both there, fission
under the Stopgaps section because it's so dangerous and because
uranium is a finite resource, and fusion under the Fringe Technologies
section because it's still quite a few years away from being workable
on a large scale.


Bill Ward wrote:
On 14 Jun 2006 15:42:05 -0700, alex18@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

I'm posting here in the hopes that people will give me feedback on my
website, www.anewhope.com. I don't have a physics degree, so I'm
hoping everything on my site makes sense and is from reputable sources.
I'm sure a lot could be added to the site as well. Thanks!

You left out nuclear energy, and the hydrogen section needs
work. Otherwise, not too bad.

Regards,

Bill Ward

.