Re: Questions on uranium reserves
- From: "phosphaenus" <phosphaenus@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Jun 2006 13:27:11 -0700
Thanks Graham: I've looked briefly at these links, and at what other
information I can find on the web about this technology, and on the
face of it it certainly seems to be a potentially feasible idea. I say
potentially because it doesn't appear to have been tried at anything
approaching commercial scale yet: one can imagine rather inconvenient
real-world problems like algal fouling? But anyway, I'll keep an open
mind on this, and certainly IF this technology is genuinely feasible,
and has sufficiently low cost and low environmental impact, then that
would presumably compensate for any scarcity of viable terrestrial
uranium reserves as a constraint on nuclear power.
Thanks again for your time and useful responses.
BTW, I evidently wasn't referring to you when I mentioned the a$$hole
bigot who's been fouling this thread like a bad smell. I guess you must
be used to him.
- Phos
.
- References:
- Questions on uranium reserves
- From: phosphaenus
- Re: Questions on uranium reserves
- From: G. R. L. Cowan
- Re: Questions on uranium reserves
- From: dezakin
- Re: Questions on uranium reserves
- From: G. R. L. Cowan
- Re: Questions on uranium reserves
- From: Paul Studier
- Re: Questions on uranium reserves
- From: phosphaenus
- Re: Questions on uranium reserves
- From: phosphaenus
- Re: Questions on uranium reserves
- From: Paul Studier
- Re: Questions on uranium reserves
- From: phosphaenus
- Re: Questions on uranium reserves
- From: G. R. L. Cowan
- Questions on uranium reserves
- Prev by Date: Re: Questions on uranium reserves
- Previous by thread: Re: Questions on uranium reserves
- Next by thread: Looking into the future
- Index(es):