Re: Elasticity?Price Vs Energy consumption
- From: "bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx" <bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 2 Aug 2006 22:06:08 -0700
Bret Cahill wrote:
Caloric intake in the US is over 40% higher than necessary.
And that's before you consider the amount of food wasted or thrown away !
And also before you consider the waste of calories that go into
the quantities of milk and meat we eat.
Supposedly dairy products have some nutritional value but your point is
valid from the energy - land use POV.
We could get by with only 20% of the farm acreage now being used and
_still_ have a healthier population.
That's not win win or win win win.
That's win win win win.
Bret Cahill
We're all going to die.
Bruce Richmond
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Elasticity?Price Vs Energy consumption
- From: Dan Bloomquist
- Re: Elasticity?Price Vs Energy consumption
- References:
- Elasticity?Price Vs Energy consumption
- From: gauravgandhi9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Elasticity?Price Vs Energy consumption
- From: daestrom
- Re: Elasticity?Price Vs Energy consumption
- From: Bret Cahill
- Re: Elasticity?Price Vs Energy consumption
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Elasticity?Price Vs Energy consumption
- From: bill
- Re: Elasticity?Price Vs Energy consumption
- From: Bret Cahill
- Elasticity?Price Vs Energy consumption
- Prev by Date: Re: Elasticity?Price Vs Energy consumption
- Next by Date: Re: Elasticity?Price Vs Energy consumption
- Previous by thread: Re: Elasticity?Price Vs Energy consumption
- Next by thread: Re: Elasticity?Price Vs Energy consumption
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|