Re: Energy Density of Coal Fired Power Plant
- From: "Bret Cahill" <BretCahill@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 10 Nov 2006 15:29:31 -0800
A 450 megawatt plant including coal and maintenance sheds and yard will
take up most of a square mile or 250 watts/m^2.
You can do better that with dish stirling.
Your subject line is about energy density, why are you talking in units of
power/area?
To make sure you were awake reading these educational threads.
How much *energy* does that 450 MW plant generate in an average year, versus
how much energy does the dish Stirling? I think that is the more pertenent
question.
Once you factor in the height and width of the steam plant -- true
power density --, then dish Stirling _really_ looks better.
Bret Cahill
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Energy Density of Coal Fired Power Plant
- From: daestrom
- Re: Energy Density of Coal Fired Power Plant
- References:
- Energy Density of Coal Fired Power Plant
- From: Bret Cahill
- Re: Energy Density of Coal Fired Power Plant
- From: daestrom
- Energy Density of Coal Fired Power Plant
- Prev by Date: Re: Energy Density of Coal Fired Power Plant
- Next by Date: Use of CR-39 Detectors Heats up "Cold Fusion"
- Previous by thread: Re: Energy Density of Coal Fired Power Plant
- Next by thread: Re: Energy Density of Coal Fired Power Plant
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading