Re: harvesting waste power in carparks




Fran wrote:
I was up at my local shopping centre the other day, and the place was
packed. I'm not sure how many cars were in this large 5+ level-carpark,

but if there were fewer than 5000 cars in there at the time, with 300
driving about looking for spots or trying to leave, I'd be surprised.

On each level in this carpark, and on the ramps between levels there
are speed humps -- lots of them -- the aim of which is to keep speeds
down to about 15kph (roughly 9 mph US). At the time, the volume of
traffic was doing this comfortably enough, but of course, during
shoulder periods speeds can increase. In the course of finding a spot
and then subsequently leaving, I crossed 45.

It occurred to me that these humps probably do quite a bit of
cumulative damage to the front ends of vehicles -- the humps themselves

are often scarred and gouged from people who for some reason or another

were travelling too fast when they reached them but even those who do
the right thing are undoubtedly putting more stress on their ball
joints, axles, shock absorbers etc. Of course, you also end up using
energy fairly inefficiently, braking far too much, having the engine
turning over at a higher averagae rate than you would if there were no
speed hump.

But what if these humps were replaced with something like a see-saw
with a slightly convex underside, about 3.6m/12 feet in length, placed
over some medium capable of being compressed -- say a gel, or even
water? Then, the momentum or "work" taken from the vehicle could be
converted by hydraulic action into the expansion of a series of pistons

But, you're missing the whole point of governments.
Speed bumps or not, the only reason those
15 kph signs are there to start with, are to
tax people, not save them money.






connected to a crank and thereafter a turbine to generate electricity.

The owner of the vehicle would lose as much momentum (and perhaps more)

going into the see saw device but because the initial impact (all else
being equal) would be smaller, and because the device would dissipate
some of the force of the impact to the medium, the damage to the front
end
would be lowered and vehicles could afford to enter at slightly higher
speed
reducing the braking required and thus avoiding cumulative recurrent
costs and even fuel cost.

If the system could work this way, then everyone would be ahead -- the
carpark gets useful energy to sell/use, and vehicle owners get
comparatively lower costs. The busier the carpark, the more energy
you'd harvest, and since this is peak time, the match is a good one. It

even occurred to me that some time well into the future, when EVs were
the rule, one could plu in one's vehicle and trickly charge a battery
from power generated by these speed pumps, in effect, recovering some
of the energy that they've put in.

Is this a viable idea? Assuming vehicles are on average about a ton,
and are entering these devices, on average, at about 15kph, how much
electricity could reasonably be harvested?


Fran

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: harvesting waste power in carparks
    ... cumulative damage to the front ends of vehicles -- the humps themselves ... energy fairly inefficiently, braking far too much, having the engine ... The owner of the vehicle would lose as much momentum ... you'd harvest, and since this is peak time, the match is a good one. ...
    (sci.energy)
  • harvesting waste power in carparks
    ... shoulder periods speeds can increase. ... cumulative damage to the front ends of vehicles -- the humps themselves ... energy fairly inefficiently, braking far too much, having the engine ... The owner of the vehicle would lose as much momentum ...
    (sci.energy)
  • Re: Mobile S-Rotor!
    ... >You are forgetting about the energy in the wind. ... Also, when you double the wind speed, you increase its energy ... >monstous S-rotor can produce at ordinary daily wind speeds. ... movement relative to the vehicle. ...
    (sci.energy)
  • Re: It cant really be true!
    ... Which is a surprise when I'm trundling along at 25mph over them." ... If I tried going over humps (the ones across the road, ... I've seen all types of vehicle going over them at a ... over humps at different speeds, which is clearly different for different ...
    (uk.rec.driving)
  • Re: Stupid "free energy" idea
    ... use up in require additional energy to the truck. ... Actually it is impossible to generate more power than you use. ... as by utilizing vehicle traffic on roadways. ... Energy sources useful for the generation of electricity include wind, ...
    (rec.martial-arts)