Re: Solar, not nuclear
- From: "bill" <ford_prefect42@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Jan 2007 06:52:40 -0800
On Jan 25, 1:24 am, "VistaKing" <BushIsATrai...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
VistaKing wrote:"Eeyore" <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
Global energy consumption = U.S. per capita levels.
All energy coming from Nuclear.
Global population 15 billion.
Current Reactor count 400
You must be crazy to think the world needs US energy consumptionlevels.You're
the most wateful energy users on the planet ! I'm not an AmeriKKKan. I agree with you by the way. But that agreementis predicated on increasing consumptive efficiency in the rest of the world
so that they aren't as wasteful as the Dung Eating population of the U.S.
But an increase in consumptive efficiency is all that is needed to avoid
the need for producing those nuclear power plants in the first place.
The Nuclear argument goes, "We can't reduce our consumption, hence we must
meet our current energy requirements with Nuclear."
The argument is Hogwash of course. But if true, 200,000 reactors will be
required world wide.
15000 to meet TWICE the current demand for both electric and oil
consumption. your 200k number is bull***.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Manhattan after Greenland ice *** melted
- Next by Date: The galaxy is a zero point machine producing mass, energy and spawns new galaxies from vacuum energy.
- Previous by thread: Re: Solar, not nuclear
- Next by thread: Re: Solar, not nuclear
- Index(es):