Re: Solar, not nuclear

Fossil fuels and even yellowcake is clearly past its affordable prime,
but not by any long shot past the global energy spot market of whatever
advancing nations like China are becoming capable and quite motivated as
for out-bidding even America for such reserves.

This one and of many others that are "oil crash" similar, are not joking
around.http://www.exitmundi.nl/oilcrash.htm

Government Confirms the Worst

"...we are entering an age of uncertainty and insecurity unlike any
other..." that will "have a devastating effect on the economy and our
way of life in the United States."

However, some think it's the greatest investment opportunity of the
century... which is why four billionaires have invested hundreds of
millions of dollars to find the solution.

Dear Reader,
I've found a document that lays out what went down at the most
important conference of your lifetime.

It was the 25th Army Science Conference in Orlando, FL, last
November 27-30.

At this historic meeting, three West Point scholars dropped a
bombshell that proves why THE WORLD\'S RICHEST MEN HAVE INVESTED $7.3
BILLION IN DEVELOPING OTHER ENERGY SOURCES TO REPLACE OIL, INCLUDING
NUCLEAR ENERGY.

Here's an excerpt from their presentation... in their exact words...
that stunned the audience: "The era of cheap, available oil is coming
_rapidly_ to an end. We are either at or very near the era when the
demand for oil will outstrip the ability of the earth to supply the
needs of the global society." To show how it will affect you, the
Army used the Oil Shockwave simulation...

... and found that a supply decrease of merely four percent will
hike pump prices to seven dollars a gallon.

Remember, this is the US Army saying this!

But why the honesty?

Because there's no keeping the top commanders in Iraq quiet when
they get ticked off.

Marine Corps Maj. Gen. Richard Zilmer sent a memo to the Pentagon
demanding alternatives to oil.

According to him, without immediate changes, U.S. forces "will
remain unnecessarily exposed" and will "continue to accrue
preventable... serious and grave casualties."

The Pentagon is pushing for an immediate switch to alternatives, and
Number One on their list _nuclear power_.

Once a "dirty word," nuclear power is now the darling, the savior,
we've been looking for.

Check out what the military is preparing to do... "AN ATTRACTIVE
POTENTIAL OPTION FOR DEPLOYED POWER GENERATION IS A SMALL
SELF-CONTAINED PORTABLE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT OF ABOUT 5 MEGAWATTS,
POSSIBLY BASED ON THE NAVY CARRIER-SIZED NUCLEAR POWER SYSTEMS." A
portable nuclear power plant would eliminate the costs of electric
generator fuel supply...

You know what that means?

BIG MILITARY BUCKS WILL BE DELIVERED STRAIGHT TO URANIUM SUPPLIERS!
WE\'RE TALKING BILLIONS!

_That_ is why the world's richest are investing in uranium. And
there are two stocks specifically that you can invest in and make an
absolute killing.

Uranium stocks have already seen phenomenal growth in the past three
years-rising fourfold-as oil, coal and natural gas plants
struggle to cope with mounting costs, dwindling supplies and
environmental repercussions.

Ted Turner even declared he'd make more on this investment than he
has in his entire life!

You see, unlike solar, wind, hydro or thermal power, the world is
primed and ready to use more nuclear energy.

We already have 103 power plants in America. There are 340 more
around the world, 30 more are under construction, 70 are planned for
completion in the next 10 years-and 150 more are proposed.

And as a result, there is literally a fortune to be made in the
uranium market.

Only it's not that easy. You have to know where to look-and
I've found two companies in particular that are going to turn $10,000
into $238,671.

Matter of fact, they've gotten off to an even faster start than I
had imagined...
Here's How My Two Uranium Picks Can Make You a Fortune
This rapid construction of nuclear plants says two things.

#1, it proves oil is almost gone and governments are taking the
appropriate steps to ensure power.

And #2, uranium stocks that have already seen phenomenal growth are
just getting started.

BUT THAT\'S NOT ALL THEY SAID...

Cutting straight through the doubletalk, these speakers
declared-without any doubt-that the coming oil crash will
sidetrack globalization and freeze economies.

Both functioning and emerging governments built on oil wealth will
lose their ability to buy off dissidents. Without oil money, the
world economy will crumble as it did in the Great Depression. Intense
poverty will force the poor of formerly oil-rich countries to rebel...

... on a scale greater than WWII.

Just look at what the Army is doing to prepare.

Why such confidence? Because it's a fact!

Once synonymous with destruction on an apocalyptic scale, nuclear
energy is now the only beacon of hope in our oil-less future.

But, while the military is recommending we conserve, change our
lifestyle, go without or find another source of energy, they know as
well as you do that three of those options are impossible.

What's their solution?

You are in a race against time. Every day that goes by is another
brick laid on the foundation of the new Nuclear Age, and another
government contract jockeying for the last of the cheap uranium.
All of this adds up - as I'll show you clearly in just a moment - to
an unavoidable conclusion: URANIUM PRICES ARE ABOUT TO GO THROUGH THE
ROOF.

This will present a number of problems for the United States in the
years ahead...but it also presents an unmistakable opportunity for
fast-moving investors - like Turner, Soros, Branson ... _and you_ -
to cash in on the uranium story...

That's because it's become clear that nuclear energy is the key to
our worldwide energy crisis. It can help satisfy our ever-increasing
demand for energy _WITHOUT DESTROYING THE ENVIRONMENT_.

Don't take my word for it, though...

Take it from one of the founders of Greenpeace.

In an op-ed piece in the Washington Post that appeared in April
2006, Patrick Moore - one of Greenpeace's founders back in the early
1970s - had this to say:

"NUCLEAR ENERGY IS THE ONLY LARGE SCALE, COST EFFECTIVE ENERGY
SOURCE THAT CAN REDUCE THESE EMISSIONS WHILE CONTINUING TO SATISFY A
GROWING DEMAND FOR POWER. AND THESE DAYS IT CAN DO IT SAFELY."

And Moore is not the only environmentalist who believes that nuclear
energy is the only way we can save our planet from catastrophic
climate change. James Lovelock, a British atmospheric scientist and
Stewart Brand, founder of "Whole Earth Catalog," share almost
identical sentiments.

To further prove his point, Moore notes that there are 103 nuclear
reactors in the U.S. operating today. In a poll of people living
within 10 miles of the plants, excluding plant workers, 80% approve
of the plants.

They have good reason. NOT ONE DEATH HAS EVER BEEN ASSOCIATED WITH
A NUCLEAR POWER PLANT IN THE UNITED STATES. You receive much more
radiation from one x-ray than you do in a lifetime of living next
door to a nuclear plant.

Those 103 power plants cut total release of CO2 by 700 million tons
annually.

The consensus is clear: NUCLEAR ENERGY IS CLEAN, SAFE, EFFECTIVE AND
EFFICIENT.

That's why the whole world wants it.

And in just a moment, I'll tell you how you can cash in on this
uranium craze with TWO COMPANIES THAT COULD TURN $10,000 INTO
$238,671 WITHIN THE NEXT 24 MONTHS!

How the "N" Word Could Make You a Fortune
Sign up now and get my new exclusive report, _The New Uranium Bull_
[2]
The Great Uranium Explosion of 2006 Will Create
Once-in-a-Lifetime
Nuclear Energy Profits!

If you had invested in the uranium market just five years ago,
you'd
have made more than five times your money back.

A $10,000 investment would have turned into $51,724.

But that's only a drop in the bucket compared to the kind of
gains
that some investors are making.

And here's the most important point: _You_ can still get in
on
the soaring bull market that's going to blow sky-high this year!

Over the past few years, investors have ridden the uranium bull
for
some extraordinary gains.Take a look at just a handful of examples:

*Energy Metals Corp. (EMC.V) has jumped 1,676% since June of
2004!

*Cameco Corp. (CCJ) has gone up a whopping 951% since April of
2003!
*JNR Resources (JNN.V) delivered 4,400% returns in just 20
months!

*And UEX Corp. (UEX.TO) has posted an incredible 8,900% gain
since
September of 2003!
Let me put that another way...

If you had invested just $20,000 - spread evenly among those
four
stocks - you'd now have an astounding $816,377.
-
(end)
-
I certainly hope this effort made all of you mainstream status quo folks
feel all warm and fuzzy, because, before long it'll only be a warm and
fuzzy memory of the affordable past. With the price of yellowcake about
to go through the roof, we'd better accomplish a few thousand of my
composite solar/wind energy footprints of 37.5 kj/m2, or else figure out
He3/fusion before the only remaining option is WW-III.

Brad, it would be a little less impossible to believe a word
you say if you were to back it up with something other than "these are
honest to god numbers" and instead SHOW US THE FUCKING NUMBERS. First
you said 50 KW/m2, and then you switched it over to 50 KJ/m2, now
which is it, and if it's KJ, then over what time frame, either way,
since it varies so utterly wildly from the numbers I have seen from
any other source, it will be taken to be a fabrication of a diseased
mind until you can provide a cite to a working demonstrator plant. As
for your 90% less energy comment, all I have to say is that is total
complete, undiluted, undisguised, utterly meritless bull***, now, I
challenge you to prove to me that lighting can be provided at 1/100 of
the energy per lumen compared to flourescent, or that a 90% efficient
furnace can be made to produce 10 times the heat per btu of input, or
for that matter that a house that's insulated to R49 (attic) and R19
(walls) can be made to require 1/100 the btus to heat/cool. I am also
curious how you plan to produce products such as food, clothing and
appliances at 1/100 the current energy requirements, and don't bother
trying the bull*** line about the disposability of the current
manufacturing processes, those things exist for good and real reasons,
such as technology advances making planned obsolescence necessary, and
other engineering aspects you're probably incapable of comrehending.
The fact is, life involves energy, and the only way to reduce by
85% the energy requirements of the world is by killing 90% of the
people in it, is that your plan? you personally, as a result of using
this bull*** to excuse your opposition of nuclear power (the only
thing that with current technology can fill the requirements for on-
demand energy in a carbon neutral way) are resonsible for the
continued use of fossil fuels. get used to that fact, because it is
one.

.