Re: The INEVITABLE H2-PV Economy in 41 years. Unstoppable.
- From: Dan Bloomquist <public21@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 01:19:32 GMT
bill wrote:
On Feb 5, 10:27 am, Dan Bloomquist <publi...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
bill wrote:
On Feb 5, 1:00 am, Dan Bloomquist <publi...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
bill wrote:
I hope you're right..
So, think for yourself. What of the economic impact?
Sigh... There's no pleasing some people. economies routinely
survive reallignments as big as this one.
Please provide just one example.
How will the world's central banks increase money supplies in the face
of diminishing resources?
The switch from a horse based economy to a gasoline based economy
comes to mind.
New cheap energy is not an example of 'adverse impact'.
The current switch from local production to international
production of trade goods also seems relevent.
New cheap labor is not an example of 'adverse impact'.
what makes you say that the resources will be diminishing?
http://oilcrisis.com/
http://theoildrum.com/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: The INEVITABLE H2-PV Economy in 41 years. Unstoppable.
- From: Dan Bloomquist
- Re: The INEVITABLE H2-PV Economy in 41 years. Unstoppable.
- From: bill
- Re: The INEVITABLE H2-PV Economy in 41 years. Unstoppable.
- From: Dan Bloomquist
- Re: The INEVITABLE H2-PV Economy in 41 years. Unstoppable.
- From: bill
- Re: The INEVITABLE H2-PV Economy in 41 years. Unstoppable.
- Prev by Date: Re: Nuclear Power: Unsafe, Uneconomical, Unsustainable
- Next by Date: Re: The INEVITABLE H2-PV Economy in 41 years. Unstoppable.
- Previous by thread: Re: The INEVITABLE H2-PV Economy in 41 years. Unstoppable.
- Next by thread: Re: The INEVITABLE H2-PV Economy in 41 years. Unstoppable.
- Index(es):