Re: Electrify the buses!

"Doc O'Leary" <droleary.usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:droleary.usenet-3252A3.07384111022007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Thank you for confirming the impression I have gotten from your posts in
other threads: you're a loony. Simple hand waving is *not* engineering,
and any mention of storage needs to address retrieval. It is
particularly amusing that you explicitly mention no less than *two*
electricity-based storage systems when attempting to take a stance
against electric busses.

What the puck is "simple hand waving" about storing/taking energy
to/from flywheels, or that of utilizing h2o2/aluminum batteries, or for
that matter via simply and rather squeaky clean combustion in a duel
fuel injected engine that'll knock your socks off at hardly any SOx or
CO2, and absolute zilch worth of NOx?

Good Christ almighty on yet another stick; what the freaking puck is
wrong with you big-energy borgs of brown-nosed *** sucking minions?

Please explain; What the mindset PUCK is supposedly within my topic
constructive yaysay mindset that's "attempting to take a stance against
electric busses"?

I'm 100% pro EB, as in being all for those nifty electric busses (just
like the ones my dad drove for decades, that is as along as coal, oil or
natural gas isn't providing any of the overhead energy), whereas you're
the ones with each of your private parts stuffed up each and every
public ass, while your brown noses are busy wiping those butts of
corporate and government big-energy. You're also the ones that don't
give an honest tinkers damn about energy conversion/transmitting cost,
nor about the vast infrastructure investments and subsequent cost of
installing and sustaining those overhead power lines, that by the way,
are extremely spendy, at best still look like ***, especially nasty
looking at each intersection, and they tend to have unavoidably killed
off far too many folks and countless birds that obviously your mindset
hasn't a speck of remorse as for caring about.

BTW; h2o2 isn't "exotic".

Yes, it is. That you don't realize it is telling. You need to stop
treating everything like a nail just because you've found a favorite
hammer.

That spooky or hocus-pocus h2o2 that you're all so deathly afraid of is
simply plain old h2o (AKA water), along with having one extra molecule
of O added to each inert molecule of h2o for good measure. Once
h2o-->h2o2 is accomplished via clean renewable energy, it's sufficiently
safe and sane to store and to utilize over a wider thermal temperature
than h2o, and damn near anything else can be efficiently combusted along
with h2o2 for accomplishing the utmost energy bang per kg as well as per
the almighty dollar/euro.

My god, you stupid ignorant folks are absolutely pathetic, not to
mention that you are all dumbfounded past the point of no return, as
well as deathly afraid of your own faith based shadows. There's
hundreds of legal items and substances that you and I have access to as
offering more lethal sorts of potential consequences than h2o2, but
you're all to snookered and/or dumbfounded by big-energy to know the
difference between your ass and your brown noses that are obviously
preoccupied as for doing what they do best (*** sucking up to the
mainstream status quo).
-
Brad Guth


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG
.