Re: Electrify the buses!
- From: Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 00:15:15 +0000
Brad Guth wrote:
"Doc O'Leary" <droleary.usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:droleary.usenet-3252A3.07384111022007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thank you for confirming the impression I have gotten from your posts in
other threads: you're a loony. Simple hand waving is *not* engineering,
and any mention of storage needs to address retrieval. It is
particularly amusing that you explicitly mention no less than *two*
electricity-based storage systems when attempting to take a stance
against electric busses.
What the puck is "simple hand waving" about storing/taking energy
to/from flywheels, or that of utilizing h2o2/aluminum batteries,
Neither are practical.
or for
that matter via simply and rather squeaky clean combustion in a duel
fuel injected engine that'll knock your socks off at hardly any SOx or
CO2, and absolute zilch worth of NOx?
How about a link to this marvellous engine ? I think you're making it up.
Graham
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Electrify the buses!
- From: Brad Guth
- Re: Electrify the buses!
- References:
- Electrify the buses!
- From: xnichols
- Re: Electrify the buses!
- From: Brad Guth
- Re: Electrify the buses!
- From: Doc O'Leary
- Re: Electrify the buses!
- From: Brad Guth
- Re: Electrify the buses!
- From: Doc O'Leary
- Re: Electrify the buses!
- From: Brad Guth
- Electrify the buses!
- Prev by Date: Re: Electrify the buses!
- Next by Date: Re: Hydrogen Production by Methanol Electrolysis
- Previous by thread: Re: Electrify the buses!
- Next by thread: Re: Electrify the buses!
- Index(es):