Re: Fossil Fuel

On Mar 25, 3:16 pm, Rolf Martens <rolf.mart...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <1174621031.518482.189...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
dwalters...@xxxxxxxxx says...





On Mar 22, 7:54 pm, "bill" <ford_prefec...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Bill, thanks for the reply. That gives me a whole lot more to work on for
understanding this.

No problem. I'm FAR from an expert in this, I just felt that an
honest question deserved a better answer than that. When you find a
decent reference on the issue, please share it, I'd like to know more
about.... everything.

Of all the fossil fuel in the world, why is there more in the Saudi
Arabia, Iraq, Iran, etc.? Did more life exist there than in any other
part of the world? Thanks.

Geology

***.

2 things. 1, there isn't more fossil fuel in the middle east,
just more of the 1 type referred to as oil. there's more methane in
russia, more coal in the us, more tar sand in canada.
The reasons why a specific fossil fuel forms in specified
location are a little more complicated than shitheads "geology" would
indicate, but geology is part of it, as is local temperature at the
time of fossil deposition, type of plants that died there and a whole
bunch of other factors not all of which are properly known right now.

Bill, great answer as usual (even when I disagree with you). If you
want to open a can worms, look up a-biotic oil production (a common
Russian theory that oil was created in the mantel of the Earth not as
"fossil" fuel). Then geology takes on a different outlook, looking for
pressure gradients, etc. Just a thought. I don't buy it but it's
interesting.

David

David W has learned a lot (in addition to what he already knew)
lately, it seems. But for some reason or other he doesn't "buy"
that very simple proof - known to many scientists for over 100
years now - for oil's of course being abiotic.

He could check out "Gas Resources Corporation" by J. F: Kenney
to see:

Biotic oil would violate the 2.d Law of Thermodynamics and
thus would have to be incarcerated at Oil Catraz.

You did read my "UNITE! Info #267en: The deep drilling for
oil in Seden, 1986-92", which was pretty detailed (30.12.2006).

Still not convinced? Then I've failed, in that respect!

Rolf M.www.rolf-martens.com- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Hi Rolf...my problem is that even following thel inks you kindly
provided, there is still a limited amount of literature (at least in
English, in Russian there is a LOT more). So, I'm holding judgement on
abiogtic petroleum production. But EVERYONE should read the literature
on this that is available. It's important to always question
scientific canon, such as that oil comes from fossils.

The issue of geology, however, is factual, in that geologists are
pretty damn good at finding near surface (2000 meters deep and higher)
oil deposits based on actual geology. This doesn't at all imply that
this oil is created by fossil organic material, just that it's found
in specific geological formations...generally...there are exceptions
of course (such as the granite layer near the Scandanavia meteor
crater).

David

.