Re: Hydrogen production

From: Dan Bloomquist <public21@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 04:51:00 GMT

Eeyore wrote:

Dan Bloomquist wrote:

Eeyore wrote:

alexhasting@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

Is there a more effeicent way of producing hydrogen besides
electrolosis. If i do produce hydrogen what are some potentential
hazards?

Hydrogen production is never very efficient.

The sulfur-iodine cycle driven by nuclear energy would be up to 60%
efficient. What did you have in mind?

Stuff that works today mainly..

Always good to be clear. You don't want to come of like Scotty with belief systems.....

.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Hydrogen production
  - From: Wonderer

References:
- Hydrogen production
  - From: alexhasting
- Re: Hydrogen production
  - From: Eeyore
- Re: Hydrogen production
  - From: Dan Bloomquist
- Re: Hydrogen production
  - From: Eeyore

Prev by Date: Re: Destroy this argument....
Next by Date: Re: Destroy this argument....
Previous by thread: Re: Hydrogen production
Next by thread: Re: Hydrogen production
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Hydrogen production
... electrolosis. ... Hydrogen production is never very efficient. ... What did you have in mind? ...
(sci.energy)
Re: Hydrogen production
... electrolosis. ... Hydrogen production is never very efficient. ... The sulfur-iodine cycle driven by nuclear energy would be up to 60% ...
(sci.energy)
Re: Hydrogen production
... electrolosis. ... Hydrogen production is never very efficient. ... That's the whole idea of Usenet. ...
(sci.energy)
Re: Hydrogen production
... electrolosis. ... What did you have in mind? ... our sister planet Venus. ...
(sci.energy)