Re: Electricity Transmission
- From: Cockamamie Khomeini <Khomeini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2007 07:48:50 -0400
Joe Strout wrote:
In article <468e8854$0$20554$4c368faf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,Wrong. Microwave radio is line of sight with similar power losses.
Cockamamie Khomeini <Khomeini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sugna41 wrote:
Is it possible to transmit electricity on a large scale withoutActually that is what radio is. You need to transmit 100.000 watts to
transmission lines? As an example, from a dam in northern Canada to
say New York city? I undersatnd there is such a thing developed as a
wireless battery charger.
get one quarter watt fifty miles. Not very efficient.
Radio's not designed for power transmission; for one (major) thing, the
transmission is omnidirectional.
They use parabolic reflectors to concentrate the beam but it still
scatters all over the troposphere.
However, wireless power transmission (WPT) is quite feasible, even over
thousands of km, provided you have a direct line-of-sight of course. Do
a search for "wireless power transmission" and you'll find quite a few
results.
It's been studied pretty extensively as one part of space solar power,
since of course it's the only practical way to get the electricity down
to the ground. It works fine, though the longer your transmission
distance, the bigger your transmitter needs to be to keep a tight beam.
Best,
- Joe
--
Cockamamie Khomeini
Leader of the known (Islamic) world.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Electricity Transmission
- From: dave . walters
- Re: Electricity Transmission
- References:
- Electricity Transmission
- From: Sugna41
- Re: Electricity Transmission
- From: Cockamamie Khomeini
- Re: Electricity Transmission
- From: Joe Strout
- Electricity Transmission
- Prev by Date: Re: Electricity Transmission
- Next by Date: Re: Nuclear expansion is a pipe dream
- Previous by thread: Re: Electricity Transmission
- Next by thread: Re: Electricity Transmission
- Index(es):