Re: Appeal from an Inventor

On Nov 3, 9:31 am, Pranab <pranabjyoti_calcutta...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
My name is Pranab Jyoti Ghosh, I am an Indian physics graduate and
myself have theoretically developed a technology on producing energy
without any kind of fuel. This technology is about producing energy by
extracting heat from atmosphere. This technology is a combination of
processes that are well tested and now in use in different industries
and research projects. I have done everything that I can do by myself.
But for further advance, I need financial and technical assistance. I
specifically want to make a virtual prototype by using data from
different experiments that I have collected from different industries
and research projects and after that get a patent and start licensing
this technology. Those who are reading this message, other than the
venture capitalists, are requested to guide me to persons,
organizations, institutes and others, who can probably take interest
in my work and will help me to make my idea a reality. I am assuring
them that this project is just need to be made and improved. All the
basic experiments had been already done successfully and enough data
had been gathered. In short, it is a new and exciting kind of
technology and as far as I know, nothing like this exists this day.
Can anybody help me to make my idea a reality?

No. Since like physics itself, the idiot laws of thermodynamics
are also crackpot gibberish, with respect to reailty.
So any and all laws concenring heat, are automatically
respooled to The thermo-irad-crackpots at The GE department of
moron,
for their moron perusal, and pre-approaval.



I have posted this idea on some blogsites and got responses like this.
"Violating 2nd law of thermodynamics", "impossible", "the vapor
produced will be instantly liquefied as soon as it will be released
into normal pressure etc and other arguments like this. But, when I
have replied them with my logic and put before them the experimental
results, there will be no solid reply thereafter. Actually all the
oppositions come from, in my opinion, from wrong interpretation of 2nd
law of thermodynamics. In this explanation, heat embedded in
atmosphere and ocean around us are part of entropy and trying to
extracting the heat is trying to decrease the entropy of the universe
and as per 2nd law, entropy always increases. But, this is not true,
because machines that can extract atmospheric heat and capable of
converting that into electricity had been invented long ago, before
the birth of Christ. Long ago (nearly 500 B.C), Chinese people
invented a toy that extracts heat energy from the atmosphere and turns
that into motion. Though I called it a toy, because it was never used
for production purpose. But according to the terminologies of physics,
it is an engine, because it converts one type of energy (heat) into
other type of energy (motion). In fact, it is a thermodynamic engine.
You will find the description of that toy on books on popular science.
So, at least there is one example that atmospheric energy can be
extracted and turn into motion energy. I think it is enough to prove
the basic scientific feasibility of my work. In spite of that, if
somebody still complaining that my project violates second law of
thermodynamics. Then I am requesting him to calculate the entropy of
my project. None have tried that yet, because I am sure that if they
do so, they certainly will find that at the end of the process,
entropy of the universe has increased, instead of decreased as they
want he result to prove that this technology violates 2nd law of
thermodynamics.
One can personally contact me at pranabjyoti_calcu...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
or pranabjyoti_calcutta...@xxxxxxxxxx


.

Relevant Pages