Re: ROGER COPPOCK explain how this confirms AGW
- From: Sevenhundred Elves <sevenhundred@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 01:20:41 +0100
chemist wrote:
Plotting a 12 month running average of monthly CO2 against
a 12 month running average of monthly satellite SH temperatures,
I get a correlation factor of less than 0.2 which improves if you
lag the CO2.That is demonstrating that CO2 is influenced by the
temperature not the reverse.
Plotting the the annual change in CO2 in as a 12 month running
average against that of the monthly satellite SH temperatures,
I get a correlation of 0.552 if the CO2 is lagged.
Thank you. Do you happen to have a more detailed report on the web
somewhere?
S.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ROGER COPPOCK explain how this confirms AGW
- From: chemist
- Re: ROGER COPPOCK explain how this confirms AGW
- References:
- ROGER COPPOCK explain how this confirms AGW
- From: chemist
- ROGER COPPOCK explain how this confirms AGW
- Prev by Date: ROGER COPPOCK explain how this confirms AGW
- Next by Date: Re: ROGER COPPOCK explain how this confirms AGW
- Previous by thread: ROGER COPPOCK explain how this confirms AGW
- Next by thread: Re: ROGER COPPOCK explain how this confirms AGW
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
