Re: ROGER COPPOCK explain how this confirms AGW
- From: Roger Thorpe <myinitial.mysrname@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 10:19:27 +0000
chemist wrote:
Plotting a 12 month running average of monthly CO2 against
a 12 month running average of monthly satellite SH temperatures,
I get a correlation factor of less than 0.2 which improves if you
lag the CO2.That is demonstrating that CO2 is influenced by the
temperature not the reverse.
Plotting the the annual change in CO2 in as a 12 month running
average against that of the monthly satellite SH temperatures,
I get a correlation of 0.552 if the CO2 is lagged.
Given that all the heat transfer sums indicate that CO2 should contribute to GW I think that the burden of proof is on you to prove why this no so.
Roger Thorpe
.
- References:
- ROGER COPPOCK explain how this confirms AGW
- From: chemist
- ROGER COPPOCK explain how this confirms AGW
- Prev by Date: Re: Google/NOVA selective Usenet topic banishment
- Next by Date: Re: ROGER COPPOCK explain how this confirms AGW
- Previous by thread: Re: ROGER COPPOCK explain how this confirms AGW
- Next by thread: ROGER COPPOCK explain how this confirms AGW
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
