Re: ROGER COPPOCK explain how this confirms AGW

On Feb 4, 8:03 pm, Sevenhundred Elves <sevenhund...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
BradGuthwrote:
On Feb 4, 10:45 am, Sevenhundred Elves <sevenhund...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
chemist wrote:
On Feb 4, 12:20 am, Sevenhundred Elves <sevenhund...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
chemist wrote:
Plotting a 12 month running average of monthly CO2 against
a 12 month running average of monthly satellite SH temperatures,
I get a correlation factor of less than 0.2 which improves if you
lag the CO2.That is demonstrating that CO2 is influenced by the
temperature not the reverse.
Plotting the the annual change in CO2 in as a 12 month running
average against that of the monthly satellite SH temperatures,
I get a correlation of 0.552 if the CO2 is lagged.

Thank you. Do you happen to have a more detailed report on the web
somewhere?

S.

I will post when I have completed my work
So far I have demonstrated that the experiments that
purport to show that CO2 is a greehouse gas are
misleading and that CH4 behaves as though it is
not a greenhouse gas in such experiments.

This promises to be interesting, I dare say.

S.

Used toilet paper is sufficient for your mindset to consider as
interesting, I dare say.
.. - Brad Guth

Your opinion is noted, studied, and found to be exactly as interesting
as the paper you so fondly speak of. As for mindsets, you should have
yours examined.

S.

What about our extremely massive and nearby moon?

Got any terrestrial GW associated with that physically dark sucker of
a mascon that's pestering mother Earth ever since the very last ice-
age we're ever going to have?

Or, doesn't gravity/tidal energy account for anything within your
faith-based conditional laws of physics?
.. - Brad Guth
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: ROGER COPPOCK explain how this confirms AGW
    ... a 12 month running average of monthly satellite SH temperatures, ... Plotting the the annual change in CO2 in as a 12 month running ... I get a correlation of 0.552 if the CO2 is lagged. ...
    (sci.energy)
  • Re: ROGER COPPOCK explain how this confirms AGW
    ... a 12 month running average of monthly satellite SH temperatures, ... Plotting the the annual change in CO2 in as a 12 month running ... I get a correlation of 0.552 if the CO2 is lagged. ...
    (sci.energy)
  • Re: ROGER COPPOCK explain how this confirms AGW
    ... a 12 month running average of monthly satellite SH temperatures, ... Plotting the the annual change in CO2 in as a 12 month running ... I get a correlation of 0.552 if the CO2 is lagged. ...
    (sci.energy)
  • Re: ROGER COPPOCK explain how this confirms AGW
    ... a 12 month running average of monthly satellite SH temperatures, ... Plotting the the annual change in CO2 in as a 12 month running ... I get a correlation of 0.552 if the CO2 is lagged. ... doesn't gravity/tidal energy account for anything within your ...
    (sci.energy)
  • Re: ROGER COPPOCK explain how this confirms AGW
    ... a 12 month running average of monthly satellite SH temperatures, ... Plotting the the annual change in CO2 in as a 12 month running ... I get a correlation of 0.552 if the CO2 is lagged. ...
    (sci.energy)
Loading