Re: The Pickens Plan
- From: "zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 08:55:00 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 19, 11:18 am, B Richardson <br...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
["Followup-To:" header set to sci.energy.]
On 2008-07-19, Rob Dekker <r...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Jonathan Grobe" <gr...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:slrng7oib8.mdr.grobe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
...
You certainly can't eliminate all 21% of the power generated
using natural gas. But you can eliminate a significant chunk
of it.
But a significant chunk of 21% of power generation is only a small
percentage of the supply side of liquid fuel.
We have to find a better way than moving energy to liquid fuel.
The oil depletion problem is not going to be solved by the supply side.
But if T. Boone did manage to get that much wind power on the grid, its
a lot, about 2 quads. Takes about 6 quads of fossil fuel to produce
2 quads of electricity. Displacing that much would be a monumental
achievement even if its mostly coal being displaced.
I don't see how he would be able to control where and what he's displacing,
unless he owned most of the other forms of power generation in the region..- Hide quoted text -
With Oil Tycoon's that's simple to understand Since in their
imaginary finacial system,
they always include Boeing in the their idiot "grid". Which is
mostly why people
with brains pulled off the "grid", and into A.I. Computers, Lasers,
Satellites, Robots,.
Drones, AUVs, PV Cells, Nanotech, Magnets, GPS, and Cruise Missiles
some time ago.
- Show quoted text -
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Batteries
- Next by Date: Re: Research: Wind power pricier, emits more CO2 than thought
- Previous by thread: Re: The Pickens Plan
- Next by thread: Re: The Pickens Plan
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
