Re: Fractal Image Compression
- From: Roger Bagula <rlbagulatftn@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 19:06:35 GMT
While is is true that the IFS based type of fractal compression is
noncompetitive ( IFS has a massive time problem for images larger 1000by1000), further advances with other sorts of self-similar compressions continue. It is a matter of the reconstitution method used for the image and not the method of the information retrieval
which continues to be a scaled linear method.
A good deterministic and rapid method of making the picture from the
information is what seems to be needed. One alternative would be to use
L-Systems translations of the IFS much as Dr. William McWorter translated both the Rauzy Pisot IFS and the minimal Pisot IFS
fractals into L systems. As anyone who has every waited for an L system knows, there is a time to scale factor involved here as well.
Another alternative is to use a Mandelbrot cartoon type expression
for the self-similar transforms, but the technology
isn't yet well developed in 2d systems either.
Stefan Bröker wrote:
Hi friends,
i search some newest stuff from "fractal image compression"?
I've got the book from Fisher but the release year is 1994. Maybe there is some newer stuff out there.
Does anybody have a good site for me?
Thank you very much
Best Regards Stefan
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fractal Image Compression
- From: Richard
- Re: Fractal Image Compression
- References:
- Fractal Image Compression
- From: Stefan Bröker
- Fractal Image Compression
- Prev by Date: Re: =??Q?Mac_OS_X_program=3F?=
- Next by Date: Re: Fractal Image Compression
- Previous by thread: Re: Fractal Image Compression
- Next by thread: Re: Fractal Image Compression
- Index(es):