Re: Fractal Image Compression
- From: legalize+jeeves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Richard)
- Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 22:51:25 +0000 (UTC)
[Please do not mail me a copy of your followup]
Roger Bagula <rlbagulatftn@xxxxxxxxx> spake the secret code
<42D414BB.1020908@xxxxxxxxx> thusly:
>While is is true that the IFS based type of fractal compression is
>noncompetitive ( IFS has a massive time problem for images larger
>1000by1000), further advances with other sorts of self-similar
>compressions continue. [...]
Sure.
Just like advances for nuclear fission continue.
Both of them are commercially negligible, however.
--
"The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline"-- code samples, sample chapter, FAQ:
<http://www.xmission.com/~legalize/book/>
Pilgrimage: Utah's annual demoparty
<http://pilgrimage.scene.org>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Fractal Image Compression
- From: Roger Bagula
- Re: Fractal Image Compression
- References:
- Fractal Image Compression
- From: Stefan Bröker
- Re: Fractal Image Compression
- From: Roger Bagula
- Fractal Image Compression
- Prev by Date: Re: Fractal Image Compression
- Next by Date: Re: Fractal Image Compression
- Previous by thread: Re: Fractal Image Compression
- Next by thread: Re: Fractal Image Compression
- Index(es):