Re: Is Mandelbrot Set symmetrical around the imaginary axis?
- From: "Akira Bergman" <akirab@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 14:27:06 +1100
Thanks Richard, I should have said at the imaginary axis and around the real
axis.
Why is not such an obvious symmetry easily seen from the equation?
z(n+1) =z (n)**2 + c
zr(n+1) + i * zi(n+1) = [zr(n) + i * zi(n)]**2 + cr + i * ci
In the above notation, the symmetry should be at 'ci', the imaginary part of
the constant.
Does this mean the Julia Sets for (cr + i * cy) and (cr - i * cy) would be
the same?
I would expect the Julia sets to swirl in opposite directions, but be of the
same shape.
How could this be proven analytically?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is Mandelbrot Set symmetrical around the imaginary axis?
- From: lkmitch@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Is Mandelbrot Set symmetrical around the imaginary axis?
- References:
- Is Mandelbrot Set symmetrical around the imaginary axis?
- From: Akira Bergman
- Is Mandelbrot Set symmetrical around the imaginary axis?
- Prev by Date: Re: Is Mandelbrot Set symmetrical around the imaginary axis?
- Next by Date: Could Mandel/Julia be quantized?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is Mandelbrot Set symmetrical around the imaginary axis?
- Next by thread: Re: Is Mandelbrot Set symmetrical around the imaginary axis?
- Index(es):