Re: Traces of the Flood In the fossil record

From: Bigdakine (bigdakine_at_aol.comGetaGrip)
Date: 07/11/04 

Date: 11 Jul 2004 21:50:14 GMT

>Subject: Re: Traces of the Flood In the fossil record
>From: Terrell D Lewis composer7NOSPAM@sbcglobal.net
>Date: 7/11/04 2:06 AM Hawaiian Standard Time
>Message-id: <5sa2f09d9k4tr8mk18qknecfu68365qr1o@4ax.com>
>
>On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 11:34:56 GMT, Christopher A. Lee
><calee@optonline.net> wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:13:04 GMT, Terrell D Lewis
>><composer7NOSPAM@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>
>>>On 10 Jul 2004 21:07:07 -0700, budikka1@netscape.net (Budikka) wrote:
>>>
>>>>While there is evidence of local floods, there is no evidence
>>>>whatsoever in the geologic record that any global flood occurred.
>>>>
>>>>All of the evidence in the fossil record supports a steady evolution
>>>>with no global catastrophe abetted by flooding.
>>>
>>>The existance of the "fossil record," itself, is evidence of a global
>>>flood.
>>
>>How so?
>>
>
>The sheer volume of the fossil record, when natural fossilation itself
>should be a rare occurance, suggest some sort of catastrophic event.
>

Terrel,

 Perhaps you can explain something to me.

Can you explain why no Cenozoic foraminifera (planktonic; they float!) are not
found in any Cambrian strata and vice versa?

Thanx.

Stuart
Dr. Stuart A. Weinstein
Ewa Beach Institute of Tectonics
"To err is human, but to really foul things up requires a creationist"
  

"Creationists aren't impervious to Logic: They're oblivious to it."