Re: PLATE MAPS OF THE PAST

From: George (george_at_george.net)
Date: 07/21/04 

Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 21:45:34 -0400

"Carsten Troelsgaard" <carsten.troelsgaard@mail.dk> wrote in message
news:40fd944c$0$214$edfadb0f@dread14.news.tele.dk...
>
> " George" <george@george.net> skrev i en meddelelse
> news:_0gLc.2388$QO.2374@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
>>
>> "Carsten Troelsgaard" <carsten.troelsgaard@mail.dk> wrote in message
>> news:40fce57b$0$282$edfadb0f@dread11.news.tele.dk...
>> >
>> > "don findlay" <don@tower.net.au> skrev i en meddelelse
>> > news:5f164087.0407191750.7c4fe54e@posting.google.com...
>> >> " George" <george@george.net> wrote in message
>> > news:<UkRKc.302$%S4.241@bignews1.bellsouth.net>...
>> >
>> > snip
>> >
>> >> <http://users.indigo.net.au/don/ee/ridgegrowth.html#s0s>]
>> >
>> > snip
>> >
>> >> Check out the Abusal Hills, and the scarps, and the
>> >> growth faults, and then tell us all what the dykes are feeding...
>> >> Lava flows?
>> >
>> > I've checked out your link.
>> > I don't see any issues with PT, unless you try to make the appearance of
>> > magnetic contours a diacronous affair. Your figure 2 seems to let the
>> > surface of the atlantic fit into the opening gap and thus gets it's
> magnetic
>> > signature by stretching the thing. And you wonder why George think that
> you
>> > are wearing down your credibillity! Who wouldn't? Turning people mute by
>> > sheer quantity of information seems to be your strategy - that it
> generally
>> > lack reason does not disturbe you the least, on the contrary: another 15
>> > pages will do the trick.
>> >
>>
>> As someone else said recently in this newsgroup, "Generating a 5 dollar
> opinion
>> supported by a nickel's worth of data is
>> stupid in ANY context. It's called "wild speculation", and it has NO
> place in
>> what is supposed to be a scientific discussion." What say you, Carlsten?
>
> It could make a big difference. Making a new model as Don does is admirable,
> but it sooner or later has to face geological reality.
> Popping a suggestion as above could be ok, but either I get it wrong or it
> just is wrong. I cann't figure Don out though - it seems to be a very
> extensive joke, if that is what it is.
>

He's a creationist. Pure and simple. The fact that he hangs out with JPT
should clue you in to his reasoning, or lack thereof.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: One-Legged Taliban Commander Puts Grenade in Ass: BOOM!
    ... What a laugh, I wasn't offended nor did I complain - that was you after you ... have offered not one iota of factual arguement worth spit. ... It's your opinion that I have no business commenting on military ... It's also not worth American blood in your opinion. ...
    (alt.politics)
  • Re: Threatening with a Toothpick
    ... suffer the same uninformed foot in mouth disease that afflicts Senator ... I'm trying to find out what you base your opinion on, ... I respectfully decline your invitation and invite you to disprove it if you ... think it'd be more worth your while than I think it'd be worth mine. ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: Feiglin: "I will rebuild the Temple."
    ... I routinely will NOT click on a link in a post if the OP didn't deem it ... worth their effort to so comment. ... Only if somebody summarizes it? ... Nothing here necessarily reflects the opinion of Hebrew University ...
    (soc.culture.jewish.moderated)
  • Re: The "Ticking Bomb Question"
    ... way to determine whether one million lives are worth more than one. ... "The majority of the people are not so afraid of holding a wrong opinion, ...
    (rec.sport.football.college)
  • Re: The Sad, Sad Legacy of UPN & WB
    ... WB shows that were of any kind of worth or appeal ... why should anyone find your opinion "...about which shows worked ... I don't watch "boring or sickening" shows. ...
    (rec.arts.tv)