Re: PLATE MAPS OF THE PAST
From: don findlay (don_at_tower.net.au)
Date: 07/21/04
- Next message: Carsten Troelsgaard: "Re: PLATE MAPS OF THE PAST"
- Previous message: Paul Lawler: "Re: On July 20.1969....."
- In reply to: George: "Re: PLATE MAPS OF THE PAST"
- Next in thread: Carsten Troelsgaard: "Re: PLATE MAPS OF THE PAST"
- Reply: Carsten Troelsgaard: "Re: PLATE MAPS OF THE PAST"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 20 Jul 2004 23:20:55 -0700
" George" <george@george.net> wrote in message news:<VUjLc.5251$%S4.3941@bignews1.bellsouth.net>...
> "Carsten Troelsgaard" <carsten.troelsgaard@mail.dk> wrote in message
> news:40fd944c$0$214$edfadb0f@dread14.news.tele.dk...
> >
> > " George" <george@george.net> skrev i en meddelelse
> > news:_0gLc.2388$QO.2374@bignews5.bellsouth.net...
> >>
> >> "Carsten Troelsgaard" <carsten.troelsgaard@mail.dk> wrote in message
> >> news:40fce57b$0$282$edfadb0f@dread11.news.tele.dk...
> >> >
> >> > "don findlay" <don@tower.net.au> skrev i en meddelelse
> >> > news:5f164087.0407191750.7c4fe54e@posting.google.com...
> >> >> " George" <george@george.net> wrote in message
> >> > news:<UkRKc.302$%S4.241@bignews1.bellsouth.net>...
> >> >
> >> > snip
> >> >
> >> >> <http://users.indigo.net.au/don/ee/ridgegrowth.html#s0s>]
> >> >
> >> > snip
> >> >
> >> >> Check out the Abusal Hills, and the scarps, and the
> >> >> growth faults, and then tell us all what the dykes are feeding...
> >> >> Lava flows?
> >> >
> >> > I've checked out your link.
> >> > I don't see any issues with PT, unless you try to make the appearance of
> >> > magnetic contours a diacronous affair. Your figure 2 seems to let the
> >> > surface of the atlantic fit into the opening gap and thus gets it's
> magnetic
> >> > signature by stretching the thing. And you wonder why George think that
> you
> >> > are wearing down your credibillity! Who wouldn't? Turning people mute by
> >> > sheer quantity of information seems to be your strategy - that it
> generally
> >> > lack reason does not disturbe you the least, on the contrary: another 15
> >> > pages will do the trick.
> >> >
> >>
> >> As someone else said recently in this newsgroup, "Generating a 5 dollar
> opinion
> >> supported by a nickel's worth of data is
> >> stupid in ANY context. It's called "wild speculation", and it has NO
> place in
> >> what is supposed to be a scientific discussion." What say you, Carlsten?
> >
> > It could make a big difference. Making a new model as Don does is admirable,
> > but it sooner or later has to face geological reality.
> > Popping a suggestion as above could be ok, but either I get it wrong or it
> > just is wrong. I cann't figure Don out though - it seems to be a very
> > extensive joke, if that is what it is.
> >
>
> He's a creationist. Pure and simple. The fact that he hangs out with JPT
> should clue you in to his reasoning, or lack thereof.
__________________________________________________________________
"The very extensive joke of geological reality" - Here:-
<http://users.indigo.net.au/don/pr/abyshills.html>
Oh, ...George (...the Balrog of Kha^z^ad D^umb)(!) Get back to yer
lair, Ye dirty piece of wall-eyed slate, and stop spoiling the
firweworks! Study some spelling or something.
(Gandalf)
- Next message: Carsten Troelsgaard: "Re: PLATE MAPS OF THE PAST"
- Previous message: Paul Lawler: "Re: On July 20.1969....."
- In reply to: George: "Re: PLATE MAPS OF THE PAST"
- Next in thread: Carsten Troelsgaard: "Re: PLATE MAPS OF THE PAST"
- Reply: Carsten Troelsgaard: "Re: PLATE MAPS OF THE PAST"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
