Re: Kook warning, Oriel36
From: don findlay (don_at_tower.net.au)
Date: 10/03/04
- Next message: don findlay: "Re: Kook warning, Oriel36"
- Previous message: William J. Beaty: "Mt. St. Helens: lecture demo using a kitchen microwave oven"
- In reply to: Bigdakine: "Re: Kook warning, Oriel36"
- Next in thread: Sergey Karavashkin: "Re: Kook warning, Oriel36"
- Reply: Sergey Karavashkin: "Re: Kook warning, Oriel36"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 2 Oct 2004 18:20:04 -0700
bigdakine@aol.comGetaGrip (Bigdakine) wrote in message news:<20041002051730.20060.00002716@mb-m25.aol.com>...
> >Subject: Re: Kook warning, Oriel36
> >From: "Carsten Troelsgaard" carsten.troelsgaard@mail.dk
> >Date: 10/1/04 9:28 PM Hawaiian Standard Time
> >Message-id: <415e5897$0$213$edfadb0f@dread12.news.tele.dk>
> >
> >
> >"Bigdakine" <bigdakine@aol.comGetaGrip> skrev i en meddelelse
> >news:20041001162057.04845.00003758@mb-m24.aol.com...
> >
> >> Could you trim sci.geo.geology from your headers..
> >
> >Do you have a problem counting or reading headers?
> >
>
> Hope.
>
> On the other hand this stuff doesn't look like it belongs on sci.geo.geology
It looks like we've got our answer how the wet-legs 'convection
community' see the importance of the Earth as an astronomical body
figures in the discussion of crustal evolution - or evolution of the
entire planet for that matter. Apart of course from it's entire
agglommeration in the first place according to the way everything
swirled into place under the action of gravity. After that it was
totally down (up?) to gravity. And heat. That right Stu? All that
'swirling agglommeration' had nothing to do with anything after the
formation of a core mantle and a crust. Wonder if it had anything to
do with its distribution in the first place...? Do think there would
be any trace of it left? Or do you think it would all have been
destroyed by density and buoyancy?
"The only point of contention is whether the mantle turns over as a
whole, or whether convection is multilayered". Multilayered in what?
And how do we get the 'what'?
Don't worry Sergey, Stick around. Stuarts legs get very chilly when
the wind blows. Doesn't like any idea about the Earth as a planet in
its backyard, doing what planets do, as having anything to do with
anything. So far as Stuart is concerned it's all to do with what's in
his mind based on the convenient assumption of subduction, and the
destruction of Panthalassa.
http://users.indigo.net.au/don/nonsense/subass.html
Isn't it, Stuart? Mental immagination. Or some sort of -ation
anyhow.
>
> Stuart
> Dr. Stuart A. Weinstein
> Ewa Beach Institute of Tectonics
> "To err is human, but to really foul things up requires a creationist"
>
>
> "Creationists aren't impervious to Logic: They're oblivious to it."
- Next message: don findlay: "Re: Kook warning, Oriel36"
- Previous message: William J. Beaty: "Mt. St. Helens: lecture demo using a kitchen microwave oven"
- In reply to: Bigdakine: "Re: Kook warning, Oriel36"
- Next in thread: Sergey Karavashkin: "Re: Kook warning, Oriel36"
- Reply: Sergey Karavashkin: "Re: Kook warning, Oriel36"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
