Re: Kook warning, Oriel36
From: Sergey Karavashkin (selftrans_at_yandex.ru)
Date: 10/24/04
- Next message: Joshua Halpern: "Re: La Palma Tsunami Paper"
- Previous message: Sergey Karavashkin: "Re: Kook warning, Oriel36"
- In reply to: don findlay: "Re: Kook warning, Oriel36"
- Next in thread: don findlay: "Re: Kook warning, Oriel36"
- Reply: don findlay: "Re: Kook warning, Oriel36"
- Reply: don findlay: "Re: Kook warning, Oriel36"
- Reply: don findlay: "Re: Kook warning, Oriel36"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 24 Oct 2004 14:50:18 -0700
don@tower.net.au (don findlay) wrote in message news:<5f164087.0410021720.48faa547@posting.google.com>...
> bigdakine@aol.comGetaGrip (Bigdakine) wrote in message news:<20041002051730.20060.00002716@mb-m25.aol.com>...
> > >Subject: Re: Kook warning, Oriel36
> > >From: "Carsten Troelsgaard" carsten.troelsgaard@mail.dk
> > >Date: 10/1/04 9:28 PM Hawaiian Standard Time
> > >Message-id: <415e5897$0$213$edfadb0f@dread12.news.tele.dk>
> > >
> > >
> > >"Bigdakine" <bigdakine@aol.comGetaGrip> skrev i en meddelelse
> > >news:20041001162057.04845.00003758@mb-m24.aol.com...
> > >
> > >> Could you trim sci.geo.geology from your headers..
> > >
> > >Do you have a problem counting or reading headers?
> > >
> >
> > Hope.
> >
> > On the other hand this stuff doesn't look like it belongs on sci.geo.geology
>
> It looks like we've got our answer how the wet-legs 'convection
> community' see the importance of the Earth as an astronomical body
> figures in the discussion of crustal evolution - or evolution of the
> entire planet for that matter. Apart of course from it's entire
> agglommeration in the first place according to the way everything
> swirled into place under the action of gravity. After that it was
> totally down (up?) to gravity. And heat. That right Stu? All that
> 'swirling agglommeration' had nothing to do with anything after the
> formation of a core mantle and a crust. Wonder if it had anything to
> do with its distribution in the first place...? Do think there would
> be any trace of it left? Or do you think it would all have been
> destroyed by density and buoyancy?
>
> "The only point of contention is whether the mantle turns over as a
> whole, or whether convection is multilayered". Multilayered in what?
> And how do we get the 'what'?
>
> Don't worry Sergey, Stick around. Stuarts legs get very chilly when
> the wind blows. Doesn't like any idea about the Earth as a planet in
> its backyard, doing what planets do, as having anything to do with
> anything. So far as Stuart is concerned it's all to do with what's in
> his mind based on the convenient assumption of subduction, and the
> destruction of Panthalassa.
> http://users.indigo.net.au/don/nonsense/subass.html
>
> Isn't it, Stuart? Mental immagination. Or some sort of -ation
> anyhow.
>
>
> >
> > Stuart
> > Dr. Stuart A. Weinstein
> > Ewa Beach Institute of Tectonics
> > "To err is human, but to really foul things up requires a creationist"
> >
> >
> > "Creationists aren't impervious to Logic: They're oblivious to it."
Dear Don, though Oriel tried to raise this problem in another aspect,
the trend of your interest to the process of Earth evolution and its
connection with the laws of evolution of astronomical bodies is
interesting for me. True, I still did not see more clear your views.
But if you can excuse my irregular posting, it would be interesting
for me if you point these matters.
Sergey
- Next message: Joshua Halpern: "Re: La Palma Tsunami Paper"
- Previous message: Sergey Karavashkin: "Re: Kook warning, Oriel36"
- In reply to: don findlay: "Re: Kook warning, Oriel36"
- Next in thread: don findlay: "Re: Kook warning, Oriel36"
- Reply: don findlay: "Re: Kook warning, Oriel36"
- Reply: don findlay: "Re: Kook warning, Oriel36"
- Reply: don findlay: "Re: Kook warning, Oriel36"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
