Re: La Palma Tsunami Paper
From: Joshua Halpern (vze23qvd_at_verizon.net)
Date: 10/24/04
- Next message: Phil. Felton: "Re: La Palma Tsunami Paper"
- Previous message: Sergey Karavashkin: "Re: Kook warning, Oriel36"
- In reply to: Thomas Palm: "Re: La Palma Tsunami Paper"
- Next in thread: Thomas Lee Elifritz: "Re: La Palma Tsunami Paper"
- Reply: Thomas Lee Elifritz: "Re: La Palma Tsunami Paper"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 20:21:11 GMT
Thomas Palm wrote:
> Thomas Lee Elifritz <crackpots@everywhere.net> wrote in news:m0Ced.3497
> $Pd2.1446304@monger.newsread.com:
>
>
>>October 23, 2004
>>
>>http://www.es.ucsc.edu/~ward/papers/La_Palma_grl.pdf
>
>
> What is interesting with papers like this is that they put more weight on
> the possibility of an 8 meter tsunami in Florida than 100 meter waves
> hitting Africa. Science is supposed to be neutral, but it really isn't.
Florida is flatter.
josh halpern
- Next message: Phil. Felton: "Re: La Palma Tsunami Paper"
- Previous message: Sergey Karavashkin: "Re: Kook warning, Oriel36"
- In reply to: Thomas Palm: "Re: La Palma Tsunami Paper"
- Next in thread: Thomas Lee Elifritz: "Re: La Palma Tsunami Paper"
- Reply: Thomas Lee Elifritz: "Re: La Palma Tsunami Paper"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|