Re: EM signals
From: Aidan Karley (aidan_at_mynameplus1.demon.co.uk.invalid)
Date: 11/01/04
- Next message: Daedalus: "Re: Scientific Reception or Is It Deception?"
- Previous message: Carsten Troelsgaard: "Re: Precession"
- In reply to: gresham: "Re: EM signals"
- Next in thread: Bob Ehrlich: "Re: EM signals"
- Reply: Bob Ehrlich: "Re: EM signals"
- Reply: gresham: "Re: EM signals"
- Reply: don findlay: "Re: EM signals"
- Reply: gresham: "Re: EM signals"
- Reply: Aidan Karley: "Re: EM signals"
- Reply: Aidan Karley: "Re: EM signals"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 17:55:22 GMT
In article <BDABBE9B.4BEC%Gresham3@cox-internet.com>, Gresham wrote:
> The oil field may also be
> related to the current since oil can be extracted from shale like
> clay-oil-water plugs by electro osmosis.
>
References?
I've never heard of this being done. But I've only been working
in the oil business for 18 years now, so what would I know about it?
-- Aidan Karley, Aberdeen, Scotland, Location: 57°10'11" N, 02°08'43" W (sub-tropical Aberdeen), 0.021233
- Next message: Daedalus: "Re: Scientific Reception or Is It Deception?"
- Previous message: Carsten Troelsgaard: "Re: Precession"
- In reply to: gresham: "Re: EM signals"
- Next in thread: Bob Ehrlich: "Re: EM signals"
- Reply: Bob Ehrlich: "Re: EM signals"
- Reply: gresham: "Re: EM signals"
- Reply: don findlay: "Re: EM signals"
- Reply: gresham: "Re: EM signals"
- Reply: Aidan Karley: "Re: EM signals"
- Reply: Aidan Karley: "Re: EM signals"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|