Re: Precession

From: don findlay (don_at_tower.net.au)
Date: 11/04/04 

Date: 3 Nov 2004 22:09:41 -0800

"Ralph Nesbitt" <ralph-nesbitt@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:<Jf8hd.14369$Al3.5095@newssvr30.news.prodigy.com>...

> Carsten: don findlay is well noted for his huffiness

Huffy? Who's huffy? Who? Me? Awww, Ralph, .. I don't think so.
I think this is all a great joke, a great big laugh, that something so
outrageously obvious as this should appear to be so difficult, and
can't figure out why you guys are so dense in sticking to the nonsense
(absolute garbage) of PT when common sense is all laid out for you on
a platter. Pearls. Pick 'em up, before I take it all down and stick
it in the bin (being huffy) And why nobody is prepared to let even a
*** of their own hesitation about plate tectonics show. I have no
reason to be huffy, Ralph. If I were, I wouldn't be talking to you,
now would I? (when was your last post to me?) . I'd be talking
*past* you, just like you are now, like Carsten is, Like Stuart used
to before he stopped altogether, like Bob Grumbine does; and John
Vidale, front man for ucla who dropped out long ago, and John Hernlund
there too (?). I don't care if nobody talks to me. It's not the point
of me being here. But it would be nice for them away from the
ringside seat if you lot addressed the issues amongst yourselves - for
there surely must be some disquiet makes itself obvious to you amongst
all that garbage of PT. If all I've done is made you aware there is
at
least someone 'out there' prepared to say so, then that at least is
something. but no marks to you all for your silence, your
professional 'solidarity'.

> when questioned about
> what he considers "minor details" that may/may not affect his "comic book
> presentations".

"When questioned"? Your last question concerned the so-called
subduction zone under Alaska, yet when I draw your attention to the
nonsense of 'crumplecrust' in that region, the manifest garbage of
things that are passed off as so-called thrusts:-
<http://users.indigo.net.au/don/ng/thrusting.html> and globally about
mountain building:- <http://users.indigo.net.au/don/to/index.html>
You have nothing to say - nor anyone else either.

> Many have asked him to present/explain a basis for his Earth
> Expansion presentations.

"Many"? Like who? The basis? The ocean floors, the mountains, etc
etc , i.e. the first order structure of the planet.

> He strenuously avoids answering because he has no
> factual basis to support his positions.

So you say? You say so. Now, I don't think you could accuse me of
strenously avoiding answering ANYTHING. What was your last question I
strenuously avoided answering? Find me a post where I have dropped
out of the questioning line. There you go ralph, ...a challenge.

 When asked/much less challenged to
> present supporting evidence/data, he responds with insulting childish rants.

There, there Ralph. You're a Platie. Sit still, I'll do your
shoelaces later... Obviously nothing I say about Pteros applies to
you. You showed promise a while back. That George though, is a
different case. I don't know why you knock about with him. He's
half-way to Pteracy. (Howling at Mars.) Needs counselling. Have youo
seen his drawings? But that's the company he insists on keeping.
He's a real Card, is our George. Blind allegiance absolute. Exists.
Explains many things.

(Me? Childish rants? Don't know what you mean.)

> Ralph Nesbitt