Re: More Methane on Mars
From: Neil Halelamien (neuronexmachina_at_gmail.com)
Date: 11/14/04
- Next message: Aidan Karley: "Re: More Methane on Mars"
- Previous message: jonathan: "Re: More Methane on Mars"
- In reply to: George Dishman: "Re: More Methane on Mars"
- Next in thread: Ralph Nesbitt: "Re: More Methane on Mars"
- Reply: Ralph Nesbitt: "Re: More Methane on Mars"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 13 Nov 2004 22:19:13 -0800
> Absolutely. If it looks as though there
really might be life there, lets hope
they discard the whole harebrained idea
of manned missions until we can study
what is there _without_ contaminating it.
I like the response to this in the Mars Society's FAQ:
Q: What are the risks of contaminating Mars with Earth life forms, or
vice versa?
A: Actually, it is arguable that this has already been happening for
billions of years. During his study of known Martian meteorite
ALH84001, Cal Tech's Joseph Kirschvink showed that large parts of the
rock were never heated above 40C (104F), proving the theory of
University of Arizona researcher Jay Melosh that it is possible for
rocks to be ejected from one planet's surface and land on another's
surface without being excessively heated. More importantly, this
discovery showed that not all rocks ejected from either Mars or Earth
are sterilized -- a fact that, when combined with the known ability of
microorganisms to remain alive in a dormant state for millions of
years, means that Earth life has probably already traveled to Mars, and
if life ever existed on Mars, it has already traveled to Earth.
- Next message: Aidan Karley: "Re: More Methane on Mars"
- Previous message: jonathan: "Re: More Methane on Mars"
- In reply to: George Dishman: "Re: More Methane on Mars"
- Next in thread: Ralph Nesbitt: "Re: More Methane on Mars"
- Reply: Ralph Nesbitt: "Re: More Methane on Mars"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|