Re: EM signals
From: Carsten Troelsgaard (carsten.troelsgaard_at_mail.dk)
Date: 11/14/04
- Next message: don findlay: "Re: Kook warning, Oriel36"
- Previous message: don findlay: "Re: Precession"
- In reply to: gresham: "Re: EM signals"
- Next in thread: don findlay: "Re: EM signals"
- Reply: don findlay: "Re: EM signals"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2004 09:40:37 +0100
"gresham" <Gresham3@cox-internet.com> skrev i en meddelelse
news:BDBC394A.5CC0%Gresham3@cox-internet.com...
> > References?
> > I've never heard of this being done. But I've only been working
> > in the oil business for 18 years now, so what would I know about it?
> >
> I found this in my files dated 1984.
>
> IONIC TRANSPORT
>
> J. G. McKelvey
Aah, something that doesn't carry a stench of pis, how refreshing. Thanks for a true nugget.
Carsten
- Next message: don findlay: "Re: Kook warning, Oriel36"
- Previous message: don findlay: "Re: Precession"
- In reply to: gresham: "Re: EM signals"
- Next in thread: don findlay: "Re: EM signals"
- Reply: don findlay: "Re: EM signals"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
