Re: Axial rotation is a sum
geraldkelleher_at_hotmail.com
Date: 12/23/04
- Next message: Aidan Karley: "Re: Continental Borders"
- Previous message: R Philip Dowds: "Re: Global Warming is a religious belief"
- In reply to: don findlay: "Re: Axial rotation is a sum"
- Next in thread: don findlay: "Re: Axial rotation is a sum"
- Reply: don findlay: "Re: Axial rotation is a sum"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 23 Dec 2004 04:49:02 -0800
No offense Don but unless your comprehension level is extremely low,the
header of the thread says it all and I would'nt particularly need to
insult you as you provide some of the most livliest comments with such
a funny and delightful way of expression.
Don't worry about it,I am having a ball watching the Newtonian guys
remain stuck with their outlook which amounts to terrestial ballistics
applied to planetary motion.It was a good shot back in the 17th century
but applying the solar system's galactic orbital motion and its
conditioning of heliocentric orbital motions generates an embarrasement
of riches,astronomically,geologically and bottom line.
Besides the conceptual basis of axial rotation as a sum of greater
rotations is so easy to visualise that I would'nt even call it a
discovery.
Again,Happy geological New Year.
- Next message: Aidan Karley: "Re: Continental Borders"
- Previous message: R Philip Dowds: "Re: Global Warming is a religious belief"
- In reply to: don findlay: "Re: Axial rotation is a sum"
- Next in thread: don findlay: "Re: Axial rotation is a sum"
- Reply: don findlay: "Re: Axial rotation is a sum"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|