Re: Axial rotation is a sum

From: don findlay (don_at_tower.net.au)
Date: 12/24/04 

Date: 24 Dec 2004 05:54:43 -0800

geraldkelleher@hotmail.com wrote:
> No offense Don but unless your comprehension level is extremely
low,the
> header of the thread says it all and I would'nt particularly need to
> insult you as you provide some of the most livliest comments with
such
> a funny and delightful way of expression.
>
> Don't worry about it,I am having a ball watching the Newtonian guys
> remain stuck with their outlook which amounts to terrestial
ballistics
> applied to planetary motion.It was a good shot back in the 17th
century
> but applying the solar system's galactic orbital motion and its
> conditioning of heliocentric orbital motions generates an
embarrasement
> of riches,astronomically,geologically and bottom line.
>
> Besides the conceptual basis of axial rotation as a sum of greater
> rotations is so easy to visualise that I would'nt even call it a
> discovery.
>
> Again,Happy geological New Year.

No, no, . No offence at all. ("I know that I know nothing...") - At
least since picking up with this Earth Expansion brute. It decimates
geology to its foundations. Any bit you pick up just about now just
falls apart. To that extent you can see how people rely on popes and
pundits to tell them how things are and pass edicts for consumption. It
highlights that science is not about investigation, because this new
perspective makes it all tremendously exciting, where before it was
boring predicable old stodge, rote players, ...cycling and recycling
their motions. Now it all has a new face, yet people apparently could
not be less interested, ..bored out of their minds in fact. The game
is 'George', still citing this and quoting that, and filling in
checkboxes there. The fact that this and that and checkboxes are
mostly irrelevant bull*** is not the point; it allows pontificating
'George' to observe that "'stuart' knows what he's talking about"
What i*s 'Stuart' talking about? Nothing that wasn't talked about
twenty years ago. All the 'Stuarts' in this place downed tools and
walked off the job anyhow as soon as someone questioned the relevance
of so-called 40 Terrawatts of composting indigestive heat, and pointed
out inconvenient assumptions all over plate tectonics that renders it
junk. Not a peep from any of them on any point of substance,
concerning the omissions I highlight on my site. And it's not as if
it's rocket science, is it? 'Science' (in geology at any rate) is all
about the language of consensus and who's saying it this week, nothing
whatsoever to do with anything of intrinsic value. Not in the Overview
Room at any rate.

No, ..I wasn't questioning the sum of the parts, just saying that by
making it into one you might be confusing people, or at least
presenting them with an opportunity to play 'confused'. By talking
about the sum you might be taking away from the essential point that
spin/rotation/ revolution/ etc/ etc (however you add it up, subtract
divide or multiply it) is the point in its own right. Surely
everybody understands spin, orbit, rotation, revolution, and "wheech"
to some degree of necessary extent, ... the important thing is
translating that into geolspeak in a way that stops people being
entranced by the 'noise' they imagine they're hearing from the Lady's
supposed 40 terrawatts of indigestion, just because she's been billed
as a spectacle, when really it's the moves of her elegant footwork for
why instead she's agreed to turn up to do the gig. Our job for the
next venue is to promote her moves, her gyrations, her turn of foot - a
virtually impossible job with this lot agreed, who will see any fold in
her nightie as evidence of billowing gas, because that's what they've
paid for. But, you know, ..a new town, ..a new show...

That's what I don't get, ...why to a man (/woman) they are blind to
anything they haven't paid for. You're confusing them with arithmetic,
Gerald. These Bozos are intent on competing - the way they see it -
and have turned up to try to learn a few smooth tricks that will crack
them a fart louder than any papal promulgation. sums bother them,
unless it's hot air in decibels. Surely the guff from george and
stuart says it all. Rockets in their own right, both of them. (Ronnie
the Rocket, and Superdaks. What a church, eh? Ding dong merrily on
high!

Hallelujah!

Quantcast