Re: Dinosaurs on a smaller earth
From: J. Taylor (jota_at_gorge.NOSPAM.net)
Date: 12/25/04
- Next message: Hindian: "Gold in South-western Ontario"
- Previous message: J. Taylor: "Re: Dinosaurs on a smaller earth"
- In reply to: George: "Re: Dinosaurs on a smaller earth"
- Next in thread: George: "Re: Dinosaurs on a smaller earth"
- Reply: George: "Re: Dinosaurs on a smaller earth"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 09:30:59 -0800
On Sat, 25 Dec 2004 05:20:27 GMT, "George"
<george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:
>
>"J. Taylor" <jota@gorge.NOSPAM.net> wrote in message
>news:d8nps05eqcmj8fum1fv86e3kq5bghlcrvk@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 17:52:59 GMT, "Ralph Nesbitt"
>> <ralph-nesbitt@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>"J. Taylor" <jota@gorge.NOSPAM.net> wrote in message
>>>news:m3cns05g7pa3e44n7939ks68s3v1rroj98@4ax.com...
>>>> On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 17:47:18 GMT, "Ralph Nesbitt"
>>>> <ralph-nesbitt@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >"J. Taylor" <jota@gorge.NOSPAM.net> wrote in message
>>>> >news:n9cgs0tckslse5a9j8pcedr01atqmdicap@4ax.com...
>>>> >> Look at this way, for me there is evidence which appears inconsistent
>>>> >> with Earth expansion, then there is evidence which seems to be only
>>>> >> explained by an expanding Earth. Now the options, to remain
>>>> >> resolutely faithful to a beloved theory, or just deny the evidence, or
>>>> >> look for alternate explanations.
>>>> >>
>>>> >I agree there is much evidence against EE. There has been some blather
>>>here
>>>> >re "Supporting EE" but nothing presented that withstands close scrutiny
>>>that
>>>> >will support EE.
>>>> >
>>>> >I have asked several that aparrently support EE to post the basis of
>>>their
>>>> >reasoning. As of this time the only response has been blather at best,
>>>but
>>>> >mostly natural fertilizer of several varieties IMHO.
>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>> My ISP has contracted with Supernews and it is possible its retention
>>>> rate is superior to the newsgroup you are using. It is also possible,
>>>> you have neglected to read what is in the archive for your newsgroup,
>>>> but prefer to select isolated post for your comments.
>>>>
>>>> In either case, it does limit you to what you are talking about.
>>>>
>>>> If you are looking for fertile ground explore Antarctica, Africa and
>>>> the Lena River area.
>>>>
>>>> JT
>>>>
>>>Very broad references. Can you be more specific?
>>>Ralph Nesbitt
>>>
>>
>> The answer is NO!
>>
>> The only conclusions which will be of value to you are those you
>> objectively explore. My arguing can only pursued you to see what I
>> think I see, and can only affirm my own failure to see, if this is the
>> case.
>>
>> JT
>
>Well, it is quite obvious that you have no interest in actually having a real
>discussion (knowing, of course, that you'd get a scientific whipping over your
>views, such as they are), so my advice to you would be to go back to your sand
>lot and play with you pail and shovel.
>
George, the point to a discussion is to first see the others view.
The fact you make the claims you do about EE having no evidence,
clearly shows your mind is made up and do not want to be confused by
any evidence which could undermine this surety of mind you wish to
think you posses.
I am sure this position allows you to believe you are scientifically
whipping ass, but it only makes you look the fool.
JT
- Next message: Hindian: "Gold in South-western Ontario"
- Previous message: J. Taylor: "Re: Dinosaurs on a smaller earth"
- In reply to: George: "Re: Dinosaurs on a smaller earth"
- Next in thread: George: "Re: Dinosaurs on a smaller earth"
- Reply: George: "Re: Dinosaurs on a smaller earth"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
