Re: Earth expansion - parameters for discussion - don't disagree with the author, or he will rant and rave like a looney.
From: David Ford (Nospam_at_internode.on.net)
Date: 01/01/05
- Next message: J. Taylor: "Re: Earth expansion - parameters for discussion"
- Previous message: Bob Officer: "Re: Questions about the Burma plate (where the quake occurred)"
- In reply to: George: "Earth expansion - parameters for discussion - don't disagree with the author, or he will rant and rave like a looney."
- Next in thread: Carsten Troelsgaard: "Re: Earth expansion - parameters for discussion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 01 Jan 2005 17:51:45 +1000
George wrote:
> "David Ford" <Nospam@internode.on.net> wrote in message
> news:41d6211b@duster.adelaide.on.net...
>
>>And btw numbskull I don't follow any religion or god - sorry. LOL
>
>
> No? I guess that shrine you have for Carey on the internet is just the last
> gasp for a lost lover, then.
>
>
>>And as for, "...Send me unaltered copies over everything Carey ever did, and
>>I'll look at it and decide for myself. ...", you are a lefty little
>>free-loader as well huh? ... and that is precisely why you are so perpetually
>>ignorant … and yet you feel you are in a position to critique what you clearly
>>no nothing about.
>>
>>True to form you are Georgie … smear-deny, smear-deny, blah blah ... on the
>>basis of ignorance. Phft!
>>
>>NEXT!
>
>
> Know nothing about? You haven't disproved anything I've said, and refuse to let
> anyone examine original documents that you claim to have in your possession.
> That being the case, you haven't proved to anyone that you actually know
> anything about plate tectonics, or Dr. Carey. If you are going to do scientific
> research, the first thing you need to learn to do is to document every thing
> regarding your research, and then allows your peers to view that documentation
> and determine for themselves the merits of your arguments. Otherwise, you are
> just another crackpot pissing in the wind.
There you go again Georgie boy, I provided extensive current and recent
references of papers, book 18 months ago, … and now you come back and
whimper for documentation and evidence ... when you didn't obtain or
read ANY of the documentation previously provided, … but here you are
again, whining about evidence and documentation for which there can be
no doubt you have ZERO intent of ever reading ...
It’s the same old story, sneer and smear, sneer and smear ... deny deny
deny … “…I didn’t read it ... I didn’t see it ... you didn’t provide it
for me! ... it doesn’t exist if I can't see it ... you only provide the
same old stuff! ... when are you going to provide some data for me? …”;
ad nauseam
Georges, you’re a transparent neurotic little troll, fishing for a cheap
shots.
Go read a PT book or something because you evidently have no intent of
reading ANYTHING about current or recent inquires in EE, and are as a
result unable to address the topic of discussion to any worthwhile level.
BTW, I don’t provide links for your benefit kiddo, their not directed
for you at all; surely you have worked this out by now? ;) heh
- Next message: J. Taylor: "Re: Earth expansion - parameters for discussion"
- Previous message: Bob Officer: "Re: Questions about the Burma plate (where the quake occurred)"
- In reply to: George: "Earth expansion - parameters for discussion - don't disagree with the author, or he will rant and rave like a looney."
- Next in thread: Carsten Troelsgaard: "Re: Earth expansion - parameters for discussion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|