Re: Earth expansion - parameters for discussion
From: Carsten Troelsgaard (carsten.troelsgaard_at_mail.dk)
Date: 01/01/05
- Next message: don findlay: "Re: Carsten needs to fix his window"
- Previous message: Jaume: "Increased Earth Movement and Related cause"
- In reply to: David Ford: "Re: Earth expansion - parameters for discussion"
- Next in thread: David Ford: "Re: Earth expansion - parameters for discussion"
- Reply: David Ford: "Re: Earth expansion - parameters for discussion"
- Reply: George: "Re: Earth expansion - parameters for discussion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 14:04:36 +0100
"David Ford" <Nospam@internode.on.net> skrev i en meddelelse
news:41d61a3d@duster.adelaide.on.net...
> err ... Georgie old-boy, this oceanic 'slab' which is normally being
> theoretically subducted ... it's ... well, it's nominally about 100 km
> thick isn't it? ...???
>
> So your incredible EXCUSE for why Plate tectonics doesn't have more than a
> QUARTER of the assumed subduction zone it needs, is that these MILLIONS of
> cubic km of ocean crust 'slab' must stack up vertically instead!
You've given every geologist here a reason not to read your next
contribution
- Next message: don findlay: "Re: Carsten needs to fix his window"
- Previous message: Jaume: "Increased Earth Movement and Related cause"
- In reply to: David Ford: "Re: Earth expansion - parameters for discussion"
- Next in thread: David Ford: "Re: Earth expansion - parameters for discussion"
- Reply: David Ford: "Re: Earth expansion - parameters for discussion"
- Reply: George: "Re: Earth expansion - parameters for discussion"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|