Re: Expanding Earth

From: George (george_at_wtfiswrongwithyou.com)
Date: 01/04/05 

Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 09:24:11 GMT

"J. Taylor" <jota@gorge.NOSPAM.net> wrote in message
news:p7ikt0lhfo5gb6g3gqpuk580t6n42tcqjj@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 20:04:08 GMT, "George"
> <george@wtfiswrongwithyou.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"J. Taylor" <jota@gorge.NOSPAM.net> wrote in message
>>news:8rhht0lhc9s1aao2em5n023a2ot7mtj303@4ax.com...
>>> On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 21:45:59 GMT, "Hank Oredson" <horedson@att.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Eigenvector" <m44_master@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:KQZBd.21$eo2.7561@news.uswest.net...
>>>>> I'm not defending nor attacking the viewpoint myself, I don't have the
>>>>> knowledge to do so. However, it would seem that this theory would be
>>>>> incredibly easy to prove or disprove based on some observations readily
>>>>> available to the astronomy field.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) If the earth were expanding the day would get longer - unless the
>>>>> earth
>>>>> were speeding up its rotation.
>>>>> 2) If the rotation of the earth was speeding up, then the moon phase
>>>>> cycle
>>>>> would change.
>>>>> 3) If the rotation of the earth was speeding up, then the position of the
>>>>> moon would change as well.
>>>>> 4) If the rotation of the earth was speeding up, then the orbital
>>>>> position
>>>>> of the earth "might" also change - conservation of energy might apply
>>>>> here.
>>>>>
>>>>> Really, geology isn't even necessary to prove that the earth is expanding,
>>>>> simple astronomical observations should prove or disprove it. Given the
>>>>> amount of data collected since the start of the space program in the US,
>>>>> all
>>>>> that information should be readily available.
>>>>>
>>>>> Does that sound like a reasonable way of eliminating the expanding earth
>>>>> theory to you all - or am I missing something fundamental about the
>>>>> theory?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Perhaps missing the main point: the theory is simply bogus.
>>>>There are many many (i.e. "all") observations that disprove the thesis.
>>>>There are very very few (i.e. "no") observations that support the thesis.
>>>
>>> i.e. - Latin - id est, is an abbreviation and means, that is
>>>
>>> e.g. is an abbreviation for Latin exempli gratia, for example
>>>
>>> Many, many, to infinity does not mean all, nor does very, very few
>>> equal no, or none, so that it would mean, that is.
>>>
>>> If an example was what you intend, this is a generalizations and could
>>> hardly be considered a proof.
>>>
>>> You exhibit the same lack of precision in your thought which George
>>> does in his.
>>>
>>> This shows your lack of exactness in your thinking. The fact, you
>>> speak of observations, but exclude others, like the spreading around
>>> Africa, and Antarctica makes your statement false.
>>>
>>> EE continues to be argued because of observations on the surface of
>>> the Earth, which are best explained by expansion due to the
>>> limitations length, width, height, and time places on these
>>> observations.
>>>
>>> Ignoring these is proof, only, of your lack of desire to honestly
>>> evaluate what is happening.
>>>
>>> JT
>>>
>>
>>Lack of precision? Lack of exactness? Pot-kettle-black. I have posted very
>>clearly and many times why earth expansion is a load of horse shit.
>>Interestingly, instead of defending it with concise, well thought out answers
>>based on verifiable evidence, virtually every EEer I've ever discussed this
>>issue with has either avoided answering those questions at all by simply
>>deciding to killfile me, or have simply relied on their tried and true method
>>of
>>addressing hard questions put to them - they simply insult the questioner ot
>>otherwise change the subject entirely.
>
> George, your playing the victim is pathetic at best, dishonest at
> worst.

Victim? Who said anything about playing the victim? Oh right. You did. I
simply pointed out what you guys do, and that is that you don't post any
evidence to prove your arguments, and simply engage in isults wherever someone
questions their validity. Those are the facts. If you can't stand the heat,
stay out of the kitchen.

> However, cannot help wonder what is causing this mental imbalance you
> demonstrate now. It seems the questioning of the certainty of the
> world around you undermines the faith you have in what you believe you
> know.

Thanks for proving my point. You've done a fine job of it.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Schoolboy Sues School Claiming Anti-Boy Bias
    ... "I am woman; I am victim." ... Women were playing the male role and still expecting ...
    (soc.men)
  • Re: Why?
    ... the person at the one 100 Play machine is playing one ... that you will take a card from the 2nd, 3rd, or even the 10th slapper ... bling cross, the metal monogrammed business card case, the 4 ounces of ... and just be a victim! ...
    (alt.vacation.las-vegas)
  • Re: New York Mining Disaster
    ... Playing the victim again. ... Playing the victim yet again ("Dale did it, ... I don't think I've ever seen you take responsibility for your own ...
    (rec.music.beatles)
  • Re: So, why would I vote Republican?
    ... some nasty, hatred yourself....no surprise. ... Joe (despite some of the truly nasty things you've said about me ... Stop playing the victim for just once. ...
    (rec.music.gdead)
  • Re: Christians are victimized?
    ... atheists is much stronger than against members of any religious ... playing the "victim" card, ...
    (soc.culture.jewish)